http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/ Lewis Carroll discussion Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:51:42 GMT fernando soto http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15698 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15698 Hi Peter, I would ignore him if I knew that he (and Robert B.) wasn't confusing new comers to LC studies. Because he posts as though his stuff was regular Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:25:36 GMT GoetzK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15697 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15697 Hi Fernando, Thank you. That's all I wanted to hear from you. Goetz Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:22:20 GMT peter wesley-smith http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15696 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15696 Fernando, I assume you enjoy engaging in this quasi-debate with Goetz. If I'm wrong in that, why not just ignore him? My suspicion is that he enjoys winding Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:15:28 GMT fernando soto http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15695 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15695 No, my answer is twofold: that it is 49.99% below the lower 50% you mention, and that "this exercise is a waste of time". Fernando Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:12:45 GMT Michael Everson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15694 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15694 ... Knock off the passive-agressive responsory, please. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:59:47 GMT GoetzK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15693 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15693 Ad rem: The question was simple. I assume that your answer is "below 50%" Goetz Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:54:06 GMT fernando soto http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15692 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15692 I agree with Michael: your presentation of the same pictures over and over again does not prove anything other than your idea (fixe?) that they are connected. Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:45:21 GMT GoetzK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15691 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15691 ... Thank you. No worry. Your statement was short and clear. So there is no need to ask you to look at this picture over and over again. Bye, Goetz Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:37:16 GMT Michael Everson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15690 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15690 ... There is no probability that the hypothesis is true, in my opinion, and frankly I am very, very bored with being asked to look at this picture over and Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:16:55 GMT GoetzK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15689 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15689 Ad rem. We take http://www.snrk.de/HolidayGheeraertsFiltered.jpg as an example. Hypothesis: Henry Holiday quoted in his illustration (left picture) from that Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:12:09 GMT fernando soto http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15688 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15688 As far as I can tell, this is one of the flimsiest things I've seen. As I predicted some time ago, if we were to follow you way of doing things, everything Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:26:37 GMT GoetzK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15687 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15687 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/photos/album/1201996902/pic/list is a collection of some of Henry Holiday's illustrations to Lewis Carroll's "The Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:24:27 GMT Robert http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15686 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15686 I hate to spoil the party, but for the sake of what I and my references believe is literary correctness and albiet controversial record keeping, it was Alice Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:18:10 GMT GoetzK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15685 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15685 ... With regard to our whole dialogue on this matter it isn't such a good idea that you are the one who complains about going to ad hominem. So let's return to Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:07:50 GMT fernando soto http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15683 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lewiscarroll/message/15683 Hi Goetz, After attempting to decipher your message, here, after a very "careless reading" is what I get: 1) you don't own up to misquoting me - even after I