linux at Yahoo! Groups

Fedora followup

Scott — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:25:12 GMT

Well, sanity has prevailed. How often do ya that these days? :) http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-November/msg01445.html It seems to me

Re: Let's bash Fedora now

Scott — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:09:16 GMT

... Definitely news, but to compare it to one of the stupidest decisions ever made by one developer, who slipped his stupid idea into a release because no one

Re: Let's bash Fedora now

thad_floryan — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:44:35 GMT

... I (still) disagree about this being called bashing since the reports of the change are news. I do agree this one is not critical, but it's still something

Re: Let's bash Fedora now

Scott — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:10:46 GMT

... Actually, Thad, in this case I'd have to agree with this one just being Ubuntu bashing. Seriously, this is nothing. They're taking it off the CD.

Re: Let's bash Fedora now

Scott — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:12:48 GMT

... Heh, is this a distro war? My distro's stupider than your distro. So there. ... And why, for the F-Spot application, did the Gnome people change their

Re: Let's bash Fedora now

thad_floryan — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:46:21 GMT

... This one, also from Slashdot, isn't any better: " It looks like the Ubuntu

Re: Let's bash Fedora now

Scott — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:55:39 GMT

... As cracked.com often says, "What could possibly go wrong with that?" I'm really in a bit of shock. One of the slashdot comments summed it up quite well...

Re: Let's bash Fedora now

Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:41:20 GMT

... This sounds so analogous to something I often joke about at work in the testing world: When something can't pass the test, make the test easier. Of course,

Let's bash Fedora now

Scott — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:31:49 GMT

Well, Fedora 12 is out, and actually looking pretty good. However, this is what happens when you let developers, rather than syadmins, develop. :) Just when I

Re: Problem Pinging Using virtual Interface

Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:51:38 GMT

... First of all, pehaps someone can chime in with some /proc magic to change the routing behaviour, but this is exactly what should happen. You're using

Problem Pinging Using virtual Interface

Kishore Vangalapati — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:15:33 GMT

Hi All, (2.6.5-1.358 smp) linuxBox(eth1)--------------------------------------------------switch--------linuxBox(10.10.0.10) [eth1 - 10.10.0.1]

Re: Debian based and Intel VGA (was: Re: [linux] Re: Fun for Ubuntu

Alexandru Fira — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:05:11 GMT

... Crap... I replied to this with a suggestion, but under the other thread title... and it was more than I care to re-type at this time... ;-) Thanks

Re: Debian based and Intel VGA (was: Re: [linux] Re: Fun for Ubuntu

Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:21:04 GMT

... Crap... I replied to this with a suggestion, but under the other thread title... and it was more than I care to re-type at this time... ;-) -- Ted Turner

Re: Fun for Ubuntu users: Microsoft just patented SUDO

Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:07:04 GMT

... Intel integrated video... and only the Debian systems are having issues. Most likely, this is either due to A: X trying to autoprobe the card and fail,

Re: how to configure sendmail

Robert C Wittig — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:51:13 GMT

... Hash: SHA1 ... I have the 'Bat' book (Sendmail) and have been admin-ing sendmail on a number of servers all OpenBSD) for almost five years now without