http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/ linuxham Sat, 18 May 2013 21:17:38 GMT Jack Generaux http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21202 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21202 I just wanted to close out this thread (hopefully.) Thanks to Ed and Tom for your advise. I ended up going back to rigctl and reworked the fldigi timings -- Sat, 18 May 2013 18:50:55 GMT Ed http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21201 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21201 ... You do not set up any rig control in cqrlog. According to your screenshot you are telling cqrlog that fldigi is supplying the frequency. You can't do both. Sat, 18 May 2013 16:33:16 GMT Jack http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21200 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21200 Ed, Thanks for advice. Flrig and FLdigi are working well together, but there doesn't seem to be communication with cqrlog. I have tried executing fldigi Sat, 18 May 2013 15:59:46 GMT Ed http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21199 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21199 ... Install flrig. Open fldigi and unselect hamlib, select xmlrpc, initialize and save. Open flrig, from the dropdown select the K3, make sure the baud rate Sat, 18 May 2013 15:35:31 GMT Ed http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21198 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21198 ... Dave, sorry but the FQP robot is wrong. Got to Logbook > Reports and select cabrillo. Fill in the menu as needed. Generate the cabrillo and edit the header Sat, 18 May 2013 15:19:10 GMT n4efdave http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21197 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21197 My Cabrillo logs to the FQP robot were repeatedly rejected due to an incompatible header. Here's the message I got from one of the FQP administrators: "FLdigi Sat, 18 May 2013 15:14:50 GMT Jack http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21196 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21196 Ed If I remember correctly, rigctl (and its daemon) were a part of the Hamlib package in Ubuntu. I am launching the daemon with crqlog setup. I will look Sat, 18 May 2013 14:50:48 GMT Ed http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21195 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21195 ... Why are you using rigctld and hamlib ? Why not use flrig ? Ed W3NR Sat, 18 May 2013 13:56:18 GMT Jack Generaux http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21194 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21194 Folks I have following configuration: Elecraft K3 Ubuntu Studio Kernel 3.5.0-28-lowlatency 64 bit fldigi 3.21.71 quisk 3.6.9 -- used to display LP-Pan2 Sat, 18 May 2013 13:33:03 GMT Dave B http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21193 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21193 ... One thing I found with QSSTV, it needs quite a bit of signal level fed into it to sync and decode, but when it does, it does a grand job, running well on Sat, 18 May 2013 13:29:54 GMT Dave B http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21192 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21192 ... Thanks Dave. All understood, and yes, will poke Elecraft re the paths/names with spaces in. That's an uphill struggle with some people though. Agreed to Fri, 17 May 2013 22:53:01 GMT Richard Dowty http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21191 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21191 I got my evolution working. I had to make by trial and error with provider on the phone. It was a experience with my provider considering they are windows Fri, 17 May 2013 22:46:12 GMT David A. Ranch http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21190 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21190 Mozilla moved away from their old versioning method about 2yrs ago (no more incremental 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, etc. for minor enhancements, fixes) and now they come Fri, 17 May 2013 22:00:08 GMT Eric Lorenz K9LGE http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21189 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21189 Interesting that they announced the "change" at v13, and now have gone through 4 updates since then to v17...? Doesn't look like a product on its "last Fri, 17 May 2013 21:44:36 GMT Marty Hartwell http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21188 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linuxham/message/21188 Hi Nigel I agree with on this one. I have in my 17.0.6 the calendar add-on and that makes it almost like the Windows product Outlook. I really like it. Marty