lnet-llc at Yahoo! Groups

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Wrobel, Stanley — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:25:05 GMT

I believe the McDonnold court was referring the creditor remedies available against McDonnold directly, as the debtor, since McDonnold was potentially a

Re: Charging Orders : Jurisdictional Issues

jay_adkisson — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:58:58 GMT

For those of you interested in my charging order motion: After 40 minutes of intense argument, covering to some degree all the issues discussed in this an

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Gary Rosin — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:02:05 GMT

... The California act seems to track Re-RULPA 703(a) in declaring that "[to] the extent so charged, the judgment creditor has only the rights of a

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Sterling A Minor — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:51:48 GMT

Agreed. Sterling A. Minor, Texas Business Attorney Minor & Bair PLLC 808 Travis Street Suite 1418 | Houston TX 77002-5734 (713) 223-8585 | (713) 223-4324 Fax |

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Wrobel, Stanley — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:39:24 GMT

The Court in McDonnold clearly stated that after the "charging order" was entered the judgment holder would merely be [unadmitted] assignee, and would not be a

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Sterling A Minor — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:33:57 GMT

I think the Court fully issued a charging order, as such is meant in the jurisprudence. The Court clearly recognized that ENFORCEMENT if the distributions were

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Stuart Levine — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:33:19 GMT

To the extent that a creditor has available a statute similar or identical to the California statute, the McDonnold opinion resolves a good number of problems.

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Kleinberger, Daniel — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:32:17 GMT

Among the aspects that I find interesting: The court is not schooled in the nuances of LLC law. The court apparently looks at the situation from a practical,

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Gary Rosin — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:28:21 GMT

from McDonnold opinion & the request for an assignment order ... GSR: An assignment order seems to be equivalent to a garnishment. Later in the opinion, the

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Wrobel, Stanley — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:48:36 GMT

This California federal court decision in Global Money Management v. McDonnold is not really a charging order decision, but instead is decided under the

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Stuart Levine — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:04:29 GMT

The decision seems to turn in large measure on the provisions under California law allowing an assignment order. I quickly checked the Maryland law and there

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Stuart Levine — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:39:28 GMT

A copy of the opinion is available for free at Google Scholar, here: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=144879498139092055&q=Global+Mon

Re: McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

Kleinberger, Daniel — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:45:38 GMT

Jay, Thanks for posting the order, which I find fascinating for several reasons - a couple of omissions (e.g., no "exclusive remedy" language in the charging

McDonnold -- Recent US District Court opinion re Charging Order

jay_adkisson — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:50:13 GMT

This isn't my case, but it was decided in October in San Diego. Note the creditor's use of an assignment order to prevent the creditor from circumventing the

Re: Charging Orders : why is foreclosure better for creditor?

Austin, Scott — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:41:51 GMT

1-800-646-1446 Pp ________________________________ From: lnet-llc@yahoogroups.com To: lnet-llc@yahoogroups.com