<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>mathforfun at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/</link>
    <description>MATH for FUN - A place to post and work math problems.</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build math model for that?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>abelov0927</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13731</guid>
      <description>Thank you for this explanation. It&#39;s good. I&#39;m trying to find out the platform finish line velocity. I&#39;m sure it&#39;ll close to zero, but the platform may not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build math model for that?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:39:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>video_ranger</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13730</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13730</guid>
      <description>Correction: I meant positive forward velocity V=(nm/(M&#43;nm))v.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build math model for that?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:34:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>video_ranger</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13729</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13729</guid>
      <description>... If the platform is completely free to move (say floating in outer space) momentum conservation requires that it will end up with a positive forward</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build math model for that?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:56:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>abelov0927</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13728</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13728</guid>
      <description>By &#39;model&#39;, I just want to describe behavior of this system. All laws of classical mechanic should be preserved. Initial platform velocity is zero V0=0. Will</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build math model for that?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:47:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>video_ranger</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13727</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13727</guid>
      <description>OK I didn&#39;t realize the ring was a flexible chain. That makes it more complex than a rigid ring. Yes if the surface has initial velocity V=0 but can move</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rich-Text Editor (Beta) does not shown messages.</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:27:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>abelov0927</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13726</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13726</guid>
      <description>I recieved empty reply from Rich-Text Editor (Beta).</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build math model for that?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:23:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>abelov0927</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13725</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13725</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ll repost message in new way. The idea is very simple. If spit a rolling ring to small parts set of n elements (1,2,3,...,n) with mass m then each of them</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build math model for that?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:05:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>video_ranger</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13724</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13724</guid>
      <description>... Yes. ... Beginning here I&#39;m not sure what you&#39;re saying. Are you assuming the broken ring continues to roll without slipping? Are any more links going to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to build math model for that?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>abelov0927</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13723</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13723</guid>
      <description>link to original site http://knol.google.com/k/alex-belov/paradox-of-classical-mechanics-2/1xmqm1l0s4ys/9# or mirror </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I Need Help With The Opposite of An Exponent or a Logarithm</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:20:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cino hilliard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13721</guid>
      <description>Yep stevo, I got way outside the box on that one but decided to leave it as it may be useful for annuities interest rate calculation which is what I thought it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I Need Help With The Opposite of An Exponent or a Logarithm</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MorphemeAddict@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13720</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13720</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 6/16/2009 00:34:47 Eastern Daylight Time, ... That&#39;s an awful lot of program for solving a simple algebra problem. I got the same answer in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCIENCE &amp; TECHNOLOGY GROUP</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:10:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Science - Technology Foundation</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13719</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13719</guid>
      <description>Welcome to the SCIENCE &amp; TECHNOLOGY mail exchange group. Join this group to collect information in SCIENCE &amp; TECHNOLOGY issues. Provide useful and important</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: hello , I am new here</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:10:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Mehra</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13718</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13718</guid>
      <description>________________________________ then do it buddy [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I Need Help With The Opposite of An Exponent or a Logarithm</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:18:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sarmad Al Jameel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13717</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13717</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I Need Help With The Opposite of An Exponent or a Logarithm</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sarmad Al Jameel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13716</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mathforfun/message/13716</guid>
      <description>... i=[((r&#43;1)^(1/n))-1]/n</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Jul  6 03:48:07 PDT 2009 -->
