<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>melbourne_XP_enthusiasts at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/</link>
    <description>Melbourne XP Enthusiasts Group (MXPEG)</description>

    <item>
      <title>Melbourne XP Enthusiasts Meeting, 5/13/2008, 6:30 pm </title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 08:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2814</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2814</guid>
      <description>Reminder from: melbourne_XP_enthusiasts Yahoo! Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/cal Melbourne XP Enthusiasts Meeting Tuesday May</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Melbourne XP Enthusiasts Meeting, 5/13/2008, 6:30 pm </title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:25:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2813</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2813</guid>
      <description>Reminder from: melbourne_XP_enthusiasts Yahoo! Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/cal Melbourne XP Enthusiasts Meeting Tuesday May</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CITCON Asia-Pacific Melbourne Sat Jun 28th - Register now!</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:29:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>erik petersen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2812</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2812</guid>
      <description>After a great conference in Sydney last year, The Continuous Integration and Testing conference (CITCON) is coming to Melbourne in 2008.  It&#39;s an open space</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[ANN] Going Agile article in Methods &amp; Tools Spring 2008 issue</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ginitram</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2811</guid>
      <description>Methods &amp; Tools is a free e-newsletter for software developers, testers and project managers. Spring 2008 issue&#39;s content: * OpenUP * How Quality is Assured by</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Melbourne XP Enthusiasts Meeting, 4/8/2008, 6:30 pm </title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 08:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2810</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2810</guid>
      <description>Reminder from: melbourne_XP_enthusiasts Yahoo! Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/cal Melbourne XP Enthusiasts Meeting Tuesday April</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Melbourne XP Enthusiasts Meeting, 4/8/2008, 6:30 pm </title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:25:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2809</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2809</guid>
      <description>Reminder from: melbourne_XP_enthusiasts Yahoo! Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/cal Melbourne XP Enthusiasts Meeting Tuesday April</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defect tracking - in particular, defects as stories</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:55:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Szymkowiak</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2808</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2808</guid>
      <description>Without understanding your context and how *you* define things, it makes it difficult to offer you explicit guidance. However, here&#39;s some food for thought: -</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defect tracking - in particular, defects as stories</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rupert Jones</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2807</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2807</guid>
      <description>Fair call. I&#39;ve worked in an environment where a portion of the development team considered &#39;ticking n things off&#39; (where a larger value of n is &#39;better&#39;)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defect tracking - in particular, defects as stories</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:01:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Hayes</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2806</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2806</guid>
      <description>Depends on POV. I think these should be counted in the teams velocity - how many story points they get through in an iteration *to their current level of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defect tracking - in particular, defects as stories</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:49:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rupert Jones</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2805</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2805</guid>
      <description>Duncan, Do the defects-as-stories contribute to your iteration velocity? If so I think this skewers that measure&#39;s usability in context of the project. What it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Defect tracking - in particular, defects as stories</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Bayne</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2804</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2804</guid>
      <description>Recently, I&#39;ve been using XP in a two-developer project in RoR.  It&#39;s a small project, so our backlog is kept in a text file of stories in source control. When</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Code base health indicators</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lukevisser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2803</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2803</guid>
      <description>On one project we have 14 methods that have complexity 10 or higher in around 6000 methods.  No particular attention paid to complexity other than good</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Code base health indicators</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:02:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Melia</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2802</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2802</guid>
      <description>I agree with the rest of your post but, on this point, we differ. I&#39;m happy to have a general rule that could be relaxed if it makes the code easier to follow.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Project health indicators</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marty Andrews</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2801</guid>
      <description>Well, Luke did say he used the metrics to &#39;indicate&#39; project health, not &#39;measure&#39;.  An important difference. -- Marty ... [Non-text portions of this message</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Code base health indicators</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:58:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Ladd</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2800</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/melbourne_XP_enthusiasts/message/2800</guid>
      <description>Marty is being a very humble. His complexian tool is fantastic and a staple in my builds !! Thanks Marty :) I try to set the complexity ratings as low as</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr4.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun May 11 15:58:07 PDT 2008 -->
