<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>metamod at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/</link>
    <description>Metamod Half-Life Utility Mod</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Configuring CVars from the command line</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 02:34:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cybermind@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/726</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/726</guid>
      <description>Halflife doesn&#39;t allow you to set cvars which haven&#39;t actually been created yet, and as such, the command line can only be used to set cvars which exist in the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prevent round from starting in MM</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>douglas.tan@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/725</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/725</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve looked at the DLL/Engine notes and it&#39;s not clear to me how to prevent rounds from beginning. In my instance, all connecting clients will be placed onto</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Configuring CVars from the command line</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:56:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>douglas.tan@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/724</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/724</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m trying to configure CVars registered by metamod plugins on the command line, instead of using server.cfg to set the value. It seems that doing something</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MetaMod and libstdc&#43;+.so</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Anderson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/723</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/723</guid>
      <description>If you&#39;re not using C&#43;+ features maybe it&#39;s okay. I guess the risk is that multiple copies of the runtime might not play well with each other.  Here&#39;s two</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MetaMod and libstdc&#43;+.so</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Florian Zschocke</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/722</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/722</guid>
      <description>... Okay, but could you explain the reason? Thanks, Florian</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MetaMod and libstdc&#43;+.so</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:43:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Anderson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/721</guid>
      <description>You shouldn&#39;t link to libstdc&#43;+*.a directly.  One way to get around C&#43;+ linkage errors when invoking gcc is to reimplement a few choice functions: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MetaMod and libstdc&#43;+.so</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Florian Zschocke</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/720</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/720</guid>
      <description>... Yes, uhm, this might be since newer gcc/glibc combinations. I&#39;m not sure but I think this wasn&#39;t a problem with older versions. So you might have to link</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MetaMod and libstdc&#43;+.so</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dieterpeter42</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/719</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/719</guid>
      <description>... Hey thanks for your reply. When I use gcc instead of g&#43;+ I get the following error from HLDS: LoadLibrary failed on ./cstrike/dlls/mymodule.so: Undefined</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MetaMod and libstdc&#43;+.so</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Florian Zschocke</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/718</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/718</guid>
      <description>On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 2:41 PM, dieterpeter42 &lt;dieterpeter42@...&gt; wrote: Hi! ... Metamod does not need the Standard C&#43;+ library since we use no </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MetaMod and libstdc&#43;+.so</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:45:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dieterpeter42</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/717</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/717</guid>
      <description>Hello everyone, I have a question about linux and metamod. MetaMod does not need to use libstdc&#43;+.so (metamod_i386.so executable)? Is that right? I have made</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compilations complications</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:48:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Florian Zschocke</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/716</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/716</guid>
      <description>... That error means that the library is not properly linked with the standard C&#43;+ library. You should try editing the metamod/Makefile and set GCC to g&#43;&#43;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compilations complications</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:43:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>abentkus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/715</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/715</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m developing on my desktop machine. I have kubuntu x86 installed so, no, its not an x64 OS. ... Auftrag von</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AW: [metamod] Compilations complications</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:36:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Raphael J. Hettich</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/714</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/714</guid>
      <description>Did u compile using a 64-bit machine? What are your server specs ? Greez Raven Von: metamod@yahoogroups.com [mailto:metamod@yahoogroups.com] Im Auftrag von </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Compilations complications</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>abentkus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/713</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/713</guid>
      <description>I have downloaded the sources for metamod and i tried to compile them, everything compiles fine but putting it into the server addon directory and running the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: compile the metamod1.19 by VC&#43;+6.0</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:40:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Florian Zschocke</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/712</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metamod/message/712</guid>
      <description>Hi! I have checked with the current source code of Metamod and all versions did compile flawlessly under Windows with VC6. I can&#39;t reproduce your problems. ...</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Fri May 24 07:37:11 PDT 2013 -->
