<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>mi-250 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/</link>
    <description>MI250 Discussion Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Sky6 SA sync</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jamc2004</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4828</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4828</guid>
      <description>Thanks again Keith- excellent information- this is all rather new to me and I appreciate your response. I&#39;ll follow up on your recommendations at the Gemini</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sky6 SA sync</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:04:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4827</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4827</guid>
      <description>Jon, yes I would absolutely build a good model first in the Gemini before syncing to TS6.  It really does improve pointing accuracy.  The manual explains the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sky6 SA sync</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jamc2004</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4826</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4826</guid>
      <description>Hello Keith: Thanks,you answered my poorly stated question. So it is best to build the pointing model in Gemini with as many additional alignments as necessary</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sky6 SA sync</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:26:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4825</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4825</guid>
      <description>Not quite sure just what you&#39;re asking.  There are differences between syncs and additional aligments in the Gemini.  Syncs simply move the existing model to a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sky6 SA sync</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jamc2004</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4824</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4824</guid>
      <description>Hello: I just set up TheSky6 to slew the mount and everything is groovy... are 3-4 star alignments with the Gemini DLX beneficial before establishing the link</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded mount improvements?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4823</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4823</guid>
      <description>Hi James, too bad you don&#39;t have the &#39;before&#39; PemPro data but quantification of the upgraded mount is nice to have.  At least it sets a baseline for you.  I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded mount improvements?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Barnett</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4822</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4822</guid>
      <description>Hi Keith Sorry it&#39;s taken so long to reply to your original post. I just got my mount back from Larry at the weekend and I&#39;ll happily post results from PEMPro</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded mount improvements?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4821</guid>
      <description>Thanks for the reply, Paul.  So far you and only one other person who has had the upgrade done has replied. No one but me it seems has the baseline PemPro data</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded mount improvements?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Romero</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4820</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4820</guid>
      <description>Hi Keith, I was going to get back to you, as my MI-250 had recently undergone a refurb. However, with school and studying, I wasn&#39;t able to check the Pempro </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upgraded mount improvements?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4819</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4819</guid>
      <description>Has anyone seen or measured any improvements in the mounts performance as measured by PemPro? I was wondering what is the outcome of the replacement of the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MI-250 Retrofits</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mountaininstruments</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4818</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4818</guid>
      <description>Hi All This is a just a heads up for any of you thinking about a retro fit.  Although the winter months are pretty well booked up, I have a few openings now.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: what is the mechanism of clutch system?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:55:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4817</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4817</guid>
      <description>I believe you would call the MI-250 clutch system a &#39;top-pan&#39; system like the AP.  The top pressure plate is coupled to the inside top surface of the worm</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>what is the mechanism of clutch system?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:26:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>chillstar2000</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4816</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4816</guid>
      <description>Hi,I study some high level GEM and found they have different clutch system.....ME--no clutch, AP--top pan and plate,Byer--on the worm gear. after buying two</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some of the New Gemini Driver features</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tom@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4815</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4815</guid>
      <description>Here are just a few of the new features of the Gemini.Net driver. 1. Fully-featured hand-controller window with real-time status 2. Simple first-time</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beta-Test of New Gemini Driver invite</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:51:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tom@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4814</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4814</guid>
      <description>The new Gemini Telescope ASCOM driver is ready for an initial beta-test. We would like to invite a few experienced users to help us test the driver and its</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Nov  9 18:58:03 PST 2009 -->
