<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>mi-250 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/</link>
    <description>MI250 Discussion Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Post retrofit analysis</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:41:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Barnett</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4832</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4832</guid>
      <description>Hi Keith. With the PE PEMPro reported  of just 2 arc secs I decided it wasn&#39;t worth me spending my first imaging night in a long time (and without a moon, no</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Post retrofit analysis</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:51:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4831</guid>
      <description>Hi James, and thanks for the upgrade update.  Did you get a chance to run PemPro and build a correction curve, upload it re-measure the PE with PemPro? Keith</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jame Lacey Gemini Focuser Help for Gemini Controller</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:00:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tom@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4830</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4830</guid>
      <description>The New ASCOM Gemini.net driver is really coming along great.  One of it features that it supports a focuser that plugs into the Feature port of the Gemini. If</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Post retrofit analysis</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>anabolicapple</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4829</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4829</guid>
      <description>Hi everyone This has been a long time coming, but finally I&#39;ve been able to put my &quot;new&quot; mount through its paces following Larry&#39;s retrofit on it.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sky6 SA sync</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jamc2004</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4828</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4828</guid>
      <description>Thanks again Keith- excellent information- this is all rather new to me and I appreciate your response. I&#39;ll follow up on your recommendations at the Gemini</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sky6 SA sync</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:04:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4827</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4827</guid>
      <description>Jon, yes I would absolutely build a good model first in the Gemini before syncing to TS6.  It really does improve pointing accuracy.  The manual explains the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sky6 SA sync</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jamc2004</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4826</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4826</guid>
      <description>Hello Keith: Thanks,you answered my poorly stated question. So it is best to build the pointing model in Gemini with as many additional alignments as necessary</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sky6 SA sync</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:26:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4825</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4825</guid>
      <description>Not quite sure just what you&#39;re asking.  There are differences between syncs and additional aligments in the Gemini.  Syncs simply move the existing model to a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sky6 SA sync</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jamc2004</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4824</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4824</guid>
      <description>Hello: I just set up TheSky6 to slew the mount and everything is groovy... are 3-4 star alignments with the Gemini DLX beneficial before establishing the link</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded mount improvements?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4823</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4823</guid>
      <description>Hi James, too bad you don&#39;t have the &#39;before&#39; PemPro data but quantification of the upgraded mount is nice to have.  At least it sets a baseline for you.  I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded mount improvements?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Barnett</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4822</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4822</guid>
      <description>Hi Keith Sorry it&#39;s taken so long to reply to your original post. I just got my mount back from Larry at the weekend and I&#39;ll happily post results from PEMPro</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded mount improvements?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4821</guid>
      <description>Thanks for the reply, Paul.  So far you and only one other person who has had the upgrade done has replied. No one but me it seems has the baseline PemPro data</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded mount improvements?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Romero</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4820</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4820</guid>
      <description>Hi Keith, I was going to get back to you, as my MI-250 had recently undergone a refurb. However, with school and studying, I wasn&#39;t able to check the Pempro </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upgraded mount improvements?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4819</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4819</guid>
      <description>Has anyone seen or measured any improvements in the mounts performance as measured by PemPro? I was wondering what is the outcome of the replacement of the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MI-250 Retrofits</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mountaininstruments</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4818</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mi-250/message/4818</guid>
      <description>Hi All This is a just a heads up for any of you thinking about a retro fit.  Although the winter months are pretty well booked up, I have a few openings now.</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Nov 23 07:22:55 PST 2009 -->
