<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>microlights at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/</link>
    <description>microlights</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: The Proposal</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James McErlain</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96725</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96725</guid>
      <description>Peter, My understanding is that you can go direct to the CAA for your permit, but the cost is many times more than the BMAA fees. Cheers James _____ From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Proposal</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:06:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith Simpson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96724</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96724</guid>
      <description>Hi Peter   I&#39;ve just been on the forum and it seems you may be correct about the CAA not being an avenue to obtain your permit but it would be nice to know</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>G-STYX Inquest</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:54:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kev A</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96723</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96723</guid>
      <description>Hello all The G-STYX inquest is currently underway all sides have given their evidence, and the coroner now has to issue his verdict; Geoff Weighall was</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Proposal</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Banks</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96722</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96722</guid>
      <description>Keith...I too thought that you could permit your plane direct with the CAA.  But someone told me I was wrong about that.  They used to put it on the inside</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Proposal</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:53:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith Simpson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96721</guid>
      <description>Hi All I think it&#39;s time for my two pennyworth in this discussion, if one can call it that. To own/operate a BMAA approved aircraft you do not have to be a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Justification for Rick&#39;s Proposed Constitution Change</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Pluck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96720</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96720</guid>
      <description>Paul, If I misinterpreted your views, I apologise.  I am also greatly heartened. Regards Bob Pluck ... From: microlights@yahoogroups.com</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Justification for Rick&#39;s Proposed Constitution Change</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:22:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Dewhurst</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96719</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96719</guid>
      <description>Bob - thanks for your input, but this was directed at Tom who flies an LAA jabiru. Dont put words in my mouth please - did I say I thought other pilots were</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Justification for Rick&#39;s Proposed Constitution Change</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Pluck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96718</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96718</guid>
      <description>Paul, Sorry to butt in and disagree with someone of your experience and stature, but I think it is pertinent.  I was both an LAA(PFA then) member and a BMAA </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Constitutional amendements</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Dewhurst</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96717</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96717</guid>
      <description>Council felt it should go to the membership too. Paul ... From: Bob Pluck To: microlights@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 9:44 AM Subject:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Constitutional amendements</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:44:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Pluck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96716</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96716</guid>
      <description>Laurie, That&#39;s a twist I did not appreciate. Does that mean that the council could, if it wished, make this rule change without reference to the membership but</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Constitution Change - A few thoughts.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:43:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96715</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96715</guid>
      <description>I rarely view the Forums, but even so, I am aware of this subject being discussed there and on here around 12 months ago. I don&#39;t therefore consider this topic</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Justification for Rick&#39;s Proposed Constitution Change</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:25:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Dewhurst</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96714</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96714</guid>
      <description>Tom Can I ask you a few questions? 1.You are an LAA member with an LAA plane - so you already belong to an association with this rule. They didnt take a vote.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Constitutional amendements</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:08:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lauriehurman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96713</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96713</guid>
      <description>At risk of being repetative; The BMAA constitution does not, unusually, allow for changes to the constitution at AGMs and EGMs It does provide for a member to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Exactly -what- was proposed?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:48:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Pluck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96712</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96712</guid>
      <description>Mike, What was proposed this time was syndicate pilots.  Knowing from whence it came, it will probably be followed by SSDR pilots, pilots who hire or borrow </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Justification for Rick&#39;s Proposed Constitution Change</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microlights/message/96711</guid>
      <description>What surprises me the most after reading and considering all of the arguments on both sides is that feelings seem to be running so high on this issue. I</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Nov  8 20:31:01 PST 2009 -->
