<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>msp430 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/</link>
    <description>TI MSP430 microcontroller users group</description>

    <item>
      <title>Startup problem with F133</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stefan Gysel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43723</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43723</guid>
      <description>Hi I&#39;m using a MSP430F133 with 32kHz crystal on LFXT1. MCLK is set to DCO which runs at ~750kHz on startup and is synchronized to ACLK at 1.04 Mhz using</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Buzzing of MSP430F169 unit</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:21:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Augusto Einsfeldt</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43722</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43722</guid>
      <description>It seems you do not know anything about the circuit and not enough about electronics. Whitout the schematics one must be quite experienced to guess (or know)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buzzing of MSP430F169 unit</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pritam yadav</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43721</guid>
      <description>Hello everyone, I am working on the testing of a unit based on MSP430F169 application. While testing the unit, i shorted pins 2 and 3 of LM317LZ (TO-92) which</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use of pre-processor defines</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:52:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Bloomquist</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43720</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43720</guid>
      <description>Hi Kris, I should have never made it sound like I was challenging your post. Please accept my apology. I have a broken rib and I&#39;m on drugs, cantankerous,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSP430F427A UART pin stuck high</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:38:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hugh Molesworth</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43719</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43719</guid>
      <description>You have to additionally set P2SEL for utx0 low while in LPM3 to allow your P2OUT command for utx0 to take effect, ME1 does not do this for you. On exit from</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MSP430F427A UART pin stuck high</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ckuecker2000</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43718</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43718</guid>
      <description>Hello, Working with the MSP430F427A. I am using the USART in UART mode. When I go into LPM3, I am explicitly disabling the UART and other active outputs to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PWM using TimerB in Continuous mode</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>old_cow_yellow</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43717</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43717</guid>
      <description>Michael, I see your point. I am aware of IMPS. Is there also an IPPS? (Where the first P stands for Parrot.) M or P, which is better? -- OCY</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SimpliciTI vs. PWM ??</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:10:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43716</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43716</guid>
      <description>I am trying to generate a simple PWM output with the eZ430rf2500 evaluation boards running the SimpliciTI protocol.  I set up Timer B to run continuously with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PWM using TimerB in Continuous mode</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:53:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43715</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43715</guid>
      <description>OCY, ... funny... ... Is that supposed to be a good thing? Maybe not &quot;rely on&quot; but at least take a look at. But anyway, it seems to me he is not relying on the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use of pre-processor defines</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:41:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>microbit@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43714</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43714</guid>
      <description>Hi Dan, I never implied anything about different optimisations ? (although that should not be as big a problem as it&#39;s made out to be at times IMO). I merely</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Timer UART (MSP430F2131)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:10:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sanjeev Kumar Kambadur</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43713</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43713</guid>
      <description>Hugh and  old cow yellow,Thanks a lot for your help! RegardsSanjeev ... From: Hugh Molesworth &lt;nzbackpackers@...&gt; Subject: [msp430] Re: Timer UART</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use of pre-processor defines</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Bloomquist</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43712</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43712</guid>
      <description>... Perhaps, a misunderstanding of these configurations. I had my hand slapped for repeating what OWC had posted on just this topic some time back. So, I&#39;m</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use of pre-processor defines</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:32:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Microbit_P43000</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43711</guid>
      <description>One easy way is to create new Build Configurations. I don&#39;t understand at times why some seem to be so focused at using the default &#39;debug&#39; and &#39;release&#39;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CP2102 and MSP430F1611</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:05:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gang Xu</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43710</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43710</guid>
      <description>Thanks for your reply. Now the problem is fixed. I forgot to enable UART RX interrupt. So CP2102 is working with F1611 now. Thanks again. ... [Non-text</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CP2102 and MSP430F1611</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:59:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Candemir Orsan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43709</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/msp430/message/43709</guid>
      <description>Sounds like the hardware in configured correctly. What&#39;s in the RXBUF when you enter the UART interrupt? (is it what you expect?) C. </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Dec  4 22:36:16 PST 2009 -->
