<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>mtt-11 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/</link>
    <description>MTT-11 General Measurements Forum</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: TRL self-calibration algorithm</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dylan Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/29</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/29</guid>
      <description>Hello Igor, In MultiCal and StatistiCAL you put in an estimate for the length of the fixture. The programs use this estimate at the lowest frequency to resolve</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TRL self-calibration algorithm</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:11:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>igorlinetsky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/28</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/28</guid>
      <description>Actually knowing the type of the reflect standard corrects the S22 phase. Igor ... Dylan</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TRL self-calibration algorithm</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:29:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>igorlinetsky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/27</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/27</guid>
      <description>Thank you Dylan When S21=S12 there is a 180deg ambiguity in the answer because of the square root function.  Similarly, there is a square root to solve for S22</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TRL self-calibration algorithm</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dylan Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/26</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/26</guid>
      <description>Sorry Igor, When de-embedding adapters you can use reciprocity (S21=S12) to solve this problem. Both MultiCal and StatistiCAL allow you to solve for adapter</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TRL self-calibration algorithm</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>igorlinetsky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/25</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/25</guid>
      <description>Hello Dylan Looks like you replied to my message but the text did not show? Regards Igor</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TRL self-calibration algorithm</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:53:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dylan Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/24</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/24</guid>
      <description>... Dylan Williams               &lt;dylan@...&gt; NIST 818.01                  &lt;dylan@...&gt; 325 Broadway                 [&#43;1] (303)497-3138 (TEL) </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TRL self-calibration algorithm</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>igorlinetsky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/23</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/23</guid>
      <description>Hello I&#39;ve been following Doug Rytting presentation called &quot;TRL Calibration&quot;.  The equations all make sense and give good results however the presentation does</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the Most Practical Method to Add Optical Capabilities to</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dylan Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/22</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/22</guid>
      <description>Hello Fei, It still is very difficult to measure scattering parameters with non-contact means. Nevertheless you might find this paper our group wrote on the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the Most Practical Method to Add Optical Capabilities to</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>feicaguo</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/21</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/21</guid>
      <description>Are you guys talking about the contactless probing solution?  Sorry about that if not. A few years back, I heard that people used optoelectronic probe to do </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the Most Practical Method to Add Optical Capabilities t</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dylan Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/20</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/20</guid>
      <description>Hello Cory, If you are interested in power calibrations, I think that Agilent, New Focus, Newport, U2t, perhaps other options exist. Some of these might have</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the Most Practical Method to Add Optical  Capabilities </title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:25:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cory.compton@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/19</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/19</guid>
      <description>Dylan, I contacted Anritsu, and they only support 1550nm for now, and their list price is about 25K.  Do you know of any other vendors that are selling </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the Most Practical Method to Add Optical Capabilities t</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dylan Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/18</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/18</guid>
      <description>Hello Cory, I believe that you are correct that the most inexpensive way to proceed is to use a calibrated photodiode. I am not sure how much Anritsu sells</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is the Most Practical Method to Add Optical Capabilities to an</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:41:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>comptoca</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/17</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/17</guid>
      <description>Hi, I am looking into what is the most practical method to add optical capabilities to my 8510C.  I need to be able to measure communication laser diodes and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Laser Diode (TOSA) Measurment Fixture</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:45:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dylan Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/16</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/16</guid>
      <description>Dear Cory, In my experience, on-wafer probes can be made to work quite nicely with TRL standards printed on PCB. I would consider establishing your first-tier</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Laser Diode (TOSA) Measurment Fixture</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>comptoca</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/15</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/message/15</guid>
      <description>Hi, I am trying to measure and model a comunication laser diode (TOSA) in a TO can.  In this case it is a 1550nm wavelength DFB laser intended for 2.5Gbps.  It</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 19:56:09 PDT 2010 -->
