<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>naturalismphilosophyforum at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/</link>
    <description>Naturalism Philosophy Forum</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: glad to be back</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:27:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5346</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5346</guid>
      <description>Good one Ken ! Surely it reflects more integrity to be honest about ones levels of happiness ? And like you say, it&#39;s normal to experience a broad spectrum and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: glad to be back</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5345</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5345</guid>
      <description>Thanks David for this strong and to the point mail.  What a breath of fresh air being on this group is again...  it&#39;s amazing how far one can drift when </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: glad to be back</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:04:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5344</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5344</guid>
      <description>Alice: Absolutely, it&#39;s a good thing to accentuate the positive, to try to put our best side forward. Trying to do better, to feel better, to treat ourselves</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: glad to be back</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:46:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5343</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5343</guid>
      <description>Thanks James, that was really thoughtful and insightful.  I will spend some time in thought about that. Alice :-) _____ From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: glad to be back</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5342</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5342</guid>
      <description>Hi Ken, That makes sense.  What ever we share will have casual effect rippling out throughout society, so it&#39;s probably best we aim to let out our good side </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: glad to be back</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Nye</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5341</guid>
      <description>Consciousness when used in this sense refers to religious ideas with Hindu roots which lack naturalistic justification. The states of consciousness for which</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Thomas Metzinger and a Song</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:21:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>stephnlawrnce@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5340</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5340</guid>
      <description>Any other philosophical tune-smiths out there? Hi Tom, I do a bit of song writing, you can hear a couple of my songs here</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: glad to be back</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:31:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JRS .</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5339</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5339</guid>
      <description>Hi Alice, Good to have you back, I&#39;ve also been out of touch for a bit due to time pressures. Sounds like you&#39;ve had a pretty rough run. Sounds pretty</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: glad to be back</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:41:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5338</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5338</guid>
      <description>Welcome back, Alice! Sorry to hear about your financial difficulties, especially with small children that must have been tough. Don&#39;t be hard on yourself for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>glad to be back</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:41:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5337</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5337</guid>
      <description>Aah it&#39;s so good to be back. I&#39;ve had this yahoo group turned off since I moved house in July and forgot to turn it back on again when we got a new email</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFW and progress</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5336</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5336</guid>
      <description>And by &quot;certainly,&quot; which I unfortunately used in both recent posts, I mean &quot;in my humble opinion.&quot; Ken</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFW and progress</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:08:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5335</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5335</guid>
      <description>Naturalism certainly does not make morality somehow random and entirely arbitrary. If someone tells me homosexuality is wrong, they have to have a reason. If</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFW and progress</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5334</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5334</guid>
      <description>JRS: You are certainly correct if you mean that the Golden Rule/Monolaw is not enough to straighten out the world&#39;s problems. It is a necessary but</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFW and progress</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Nye</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5333</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5333</guid>
      <description>Then for that person, homosexuality is immoral. Naturalism implies that there are no external standards of morality, nothing handed down by gods or written in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFW and progress</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:24:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JRS .</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5332</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/5332</guid>
      <description>I can see a problem with that. One may feel that they personally should not have the freedom to be gay and use that to deny the rights of others to be gay. </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Nov 10 02:44:13 PST 2009 -->
