<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>neoplatonism at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/</link>
    <description>NEOPLATONISM</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope Analyzed</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vaeringjar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2884</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2884</guid>
      <description>... I hit the post button by accident and meant to add in reply yes, I think you can see things also from her perspective too. But here&#39;s a question - what</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope Analyzed</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vaeringjar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2883</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2883</guid>
      <description>... I think you get 4 anima figures in a Jungian interpretation of the Odyssey - Circe, Calypso, Nausicaa, and then finally Penelope. You can see the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope Analyzed</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:32:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Uebersax</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2882</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2882</guid>
      <description>Thanks Dennis. I had composed a post on Penelope but apparently didn&#39;t post it before, as I don&#39;t see it now.  I&#39;ll try to reconstruct it: The following are</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Penelope Analyzed</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vaeringjar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2881</guid>
      <description>Synchronicity strikes, as they say. John Finamore just sent this notice to ISNS members, but for others not members, here it is: The Feminine Personification</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Book on Aristotle Metaphysics Theta</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vaeringjar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2880</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2880</guid>
      <description>Notice of a new publication received from OUP today: Doing and Being An Interpretation of Aristotle&#39;s &lt;i&gt;Metaphysics&lt;/i&gt; Theta Jonathan Beere Oxford Aristotle</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tarrant reviews Ancient Commentators book</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:23:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vaeringjar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2879</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2879</guid>
      <description>... Yes, definitely is. &quot;I readily agree that I could not write a satisfying book with a title such as this. However, if I had to do so then the first thing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tarrant reviews Ancient Commentators book</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:11:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Wallace</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2878</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2878</guid>
      <description>Hi everyone, Prof. Harold Tarrant has recently reviewed on Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews a significant new book: Miira Tuominen, The Ancient Commentators on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope weaving</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:06:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>leslie greenhill</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2877</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2877</guid>
      <description>I raised the issue of Penelope, the number 108 and Pythagoreanism.  I have just finished writing a new paper of about 10,000 words.  I hope to complete</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope weaving</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Mether</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2876</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2876</guid>
      <description>I have the book. With a math partner who is also a Taoist priest, we are collaborating on a book that suggests some kind of intuitive knowledge of fractals is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope weaving</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:03:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vaeringjar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2875</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2875</guid>
      <description>... That&#39;s very impressive, Tim, a good reading I think. This thread [sic!] has reminded me also of Catullus&#39; great poem 64 and its ecphrasis on Ariadne</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope weaving</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Merrily Harpur</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2874</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2874</guid>
      <description>On the subject of ancient measure and numerology, was anyone here at Thames and Hudson&#39;s launch of John Michell&#39;s book &#39;How the World is Made: The Story of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope weaving</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:36:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>leslie greenhill</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2873</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2873</guid>
      <description>According to Robert Graves, Penelope might also mean &quot;striped duck&quot;.   Penelope holds on to what matters most to her.  She buys time and she is cunning in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope weaving</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:46:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michael Chase</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2872</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2872</guid>
      <description>... On the symbolism of weaving, I&#39;d like to recommend Robert Eisler&#39;s magnificent Weltenmantel und Himmelszelt (2 vols., Munich 1910), a work of stupendous</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope weaving</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:05:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Mether</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2871</guid>
      <description>John, i don&#39;t know where I read it but the name Penelope means something like &quot;weaving&quot;, &quot;woof&quot;, and &quot;cunning&quot; (nice match for her husband) if my memory is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Penelope weaving</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:02:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tim Addey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2870</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/neoplatonism/message/2870</guid>
      <description>... This is an interesting interpretation. The idea of the psyche alternating between periods of unification and unraveling seems psychologically appropriate. </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Dec 20 12:31:55 PST 2009 -->
