http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/ IPTC NewsML-G2 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:38:03 GMT LE MEUR Laurent http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/834 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/834 It's interesting to see this IETF draft, inspired by the Atom category, taking the same route as the IPTC some time ago for the News Architecture and Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:41:24 GMT Evain, Jean-Pierre http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/833 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/833 Hi Joel, I had a first darft of NewsML-G2 (and associated parts of NAR) but I wnat to re-do and I moved from the server where it was. I hope to have some time Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:46:43 GMT Joel Amoussou http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/832 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/832 Hi All, What is the current status of developing a NAR OWL ontology? Best regards, Joel Amoussou Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:22:35 GMT Paul Harman http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/831 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/831 From: newsml-g2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newsml-g2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Steidl (IPTC) ... Absolutely. What I'd like to see is not only a Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:41:20 GMT Michael Steidl (IPTC) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/830 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/830 Robert to clarify: this is not an issue of specifications but of common sense. We could think about adding it as a Best Practice to the Guidelines. Michael ... Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:22:06 GMT robert.schmidt-nia@... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/829 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/829 This sounds resonable. We should put this on the agenda für the next conference call, and if possible get a quick decission. Robert Von: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:22:57 GMT Michael Steidl (IPTC) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/828 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/828 Paul being only a particle of the community: reading your first paragraph it instantly occurred to me to use the signal for this purpose. I support your Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:04:48 GMT Paul Harman http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/827 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/827 PA occasionally receives requests from its package service customers that they'd like to know what items have been changed since the last time they received Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:26:38 GMT Michael Steidl (IPTC) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/826 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/826 Paul the G2 developer group had long discussions on how to model packages and one of the cornerstones was to express the semantics of a group in the whole Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:45:32 GMT Paul Harman http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/825 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/825 Michael, Dave, Thanks for that. I understand why some providers might need a role for group. Currently, PA has no such requirement because the relationship Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:21:04 GMT dave.compton@... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/824 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/824 ... one of the least needed globally generic CVs as how package structures are designed and expressed is very provider specific, and within the domain of a Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:48:36 GMT Michael Steidl (IPTC) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/823 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/823 Paul first: that groups MAY have a role in 6.4 is an erratum, but the reference is always the spec table and not a free text section. So what's behind the Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:53:49 GMT Paul Harman http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/822 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/822 From: newsml-g2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newsml-g2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of dave.compton@... ... Okay, good. That implies that there is an Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:17:45 GMT dave.compton@... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/821 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/821 ... error. group/@role is mandatory as per the XSD. DC ________________________________ From: newsml-g2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newsml-g2@yahoogroups.com] On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:25:33 GMT Paul Harman http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/820 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-g2/message/820 I'm a bit confused about group roles. The Implementation Guide states (section 8.3.1 page 60) that a group MUST have a @role, however the PCL specification