<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>nostratic at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/</link>
    <description>Nostratic</description>

    <item>
      <title>&#39;Journal of Language Relationship&#39; Launched</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>indoeurop</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/959</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/959</guid>
      <description>Dear Colleagues, It is with great pleasure that we are able to introduce to you a brand new peer-reviewed international scientific journal dedicated to various</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nostratic 1st Person Pronoun (Long)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/958</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/958</guid>
      <description>Ron, it is all in your point of view. Actually, the earliest language had _no_ pronouns and these words of various meanings were used in place of them. Have</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nostratic 1st Person Pronoun (Long)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:30:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>etherman23</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/957</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/957</guid>
      <description>Perhaps I do, but I know of no other language that has 7 (or maybe just 5) roots for the first person pronoun. He also reconstructs 3 2nd person roots. Plus</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nostratic 1st Person Pronoun (Long)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/956</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/956</guid>
      <description>... From: etherman23&lt;mailto:etherman23@...&gt; To: nostratic@yahoogroups.com&lt;mailto:nostratic@yahoogroups.com&gt; Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 1:14 AM </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nostratic 1st Person Pronoun (Long)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:14:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>etherman23</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/955</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/955</guid>
      <description>So I&#39;ve been thinking about the 1ps pronouns in Nostratic, and I&#39;m not pleased. There appear to be a dizzying number of pronouns. Bomhard reconstructs *mi,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIE Root Form</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:14:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/954</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/954</guid>
      <description>Some of you may be interested in this short essay: http://geocities.com/proto-language/ThePIERoot.htm Patrick</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vocalic Theory (&#39;Laryngeal&#39; Theory)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:48:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/953</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/953</guid>
      <description>... From: &quot;etherman23&quot; &lt;etherman23@...&gt; To: &lt;nostratic@yahoogroups.com&gt; Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:41 PM Subject: [nostratic] Re: Vocalic Theory</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vocalic Theory (&#39;Laryngeal&#39; Theory)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:41:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>etherman23</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/952</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/952</guid>
      <description>... Theory, ... could ... comment from ... In order for your theory to replace the Laryngeal Theory it has to be a better theory. It thus has to explain more</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vocalic Theory (&#39;Laryngeal&#39; Theory)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:11:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/951</guid>
      <description>I have made several additions to http://geocities.com/proto-language/OneLaryngealVocalicTheory.htm of a minor variety. In response to my challenge to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Vocalic Theory (PIE *al-)</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 10:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/950</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/950</guid>
      <description>Brian wrote some days ago about the superiority of the &#39;Laryngeal&#39; Theory in explaining the forms we find in PIE of *ag^- and *al-. I explained what I thought</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vocalic Theory of PIE Laryngeal(s)</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:26:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/949</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/949</guid>
      <description>I have now finished my essay of the Vocalic Theory, subject to further revisions. I would be grateful for any positive or negative feedback. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vocalic Theory of PIE Laryngeal(s)</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:22:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/948</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/948</guid>
      <description>I have now finished my essay of the Vocalic Theory, subject to further revisions. I would be grateful for any positive or negative feedback. Patrick</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: &#39;Laryngeal&#39; Theory to be replaced by Vocalic Theory?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 08:41:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/947</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/947</guid>
      <description>I thought a few of you might be interested in this short essay at http://geocities.com/proto-language/OneLaryngealVocalicTheory.htm Patrick</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Nostratic-L] Re: LAPIS PHILOSOPHORUM (4)</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/946</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/946</guid>
      <description>... From: &quot;Patrick Ryan&quot; &lt;proto-language@...&gt; To: &lt;Nostratic-L@yahoogroups.com&gt; Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 4:59 AM Subject: Re: [Nostratic-L] Re: LAPIS</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAPIS PHILOSOPHORUM (5)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:19:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Ryan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/945</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nostratic/message/945</guid>
      <description>&lt;...&gt; ... &lt;...&gt; *** Patrick: As a working hypothesis, I have utilized the phonological inventory specified above to analyze roots in over 10 language families;</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Feb 14 05:43:40 PST 2010 -->
