<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>novajug at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/</link>
    <description>Northern Virginia Java Users Group (NOVA</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: What&#39;s the point??</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:33:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jawabean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13414</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13414</guid>
      <description>... i doubt that annotations would make it easier to understand the &quot;marker&quot;  concept. they&#39;re nice feature, but it&#39;s a new thing to understand for a newbie,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What&#39;s the point??</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:53:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>steve-vago@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13413</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13413</guid>
      <description>if only that were true...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What&#39;s the point??</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:31:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Medinets</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13412</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13412</guid>
      <description>... This quote deserves to live forever!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining Classes Within Methods</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:39:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith R. Bennett</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13411</guid>
      <description>Dave - Thanks for responding. Yes, it is a human issue and not a compiler issue. 1) For me, having the classes defined within the method enhances readability.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Run A Jar in Maven?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Bock</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13410</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13410</guid>
      <description>Keith, I&#39;m not sure what you are trying to do here... do you want maven to *launch* your script, or are you trying to use Maven to *assemble* everything</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What&#39;s the point??</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Bock</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13409</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13409</guid>
      <description>Sorry I didn&#39;t respond sooner - just catching up on about a month&#39;s worth of emails. The notion of a &#39;marker&#39; interface is somewhat retired in Java now that we</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining Classes Within Methods</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:18:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Bock</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13408</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13408</guid>
      <description>Keith, Regarding garbage collection and memory allocation, the speaker you referred to earlier was Brian Goetz.  If you summarize the thread into a concise</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining Classes Within Methods</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:27:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Madhu Siddalingaiah</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13407</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13407</guid>
      <description>... I&#39;m with you there. I continue to be amazed at how good modern collectors are, but you can abuse the collector if you try hard enough. We had a case years</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining Classes Within Methods</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Madhu Siddalingaiah</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13406</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13406</guid>
      <description>... This is probably not a simple number as it depends on object graph complexity. You might get a ballpark value, but it&#39;s probably easier to measure it for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining Classes Within Methods</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:25:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith R. Bennett</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13405</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13405</guid>
      <description>Madhu - I agree with everything you said, except for a couple of points: 1) As implied by David, the statement that &quot;allocating more memory is costlier than</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining Classes Within Methods</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:05:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David A. Sisk</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13404</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13404</guid>
      <description>  Just one small point,   Mark and sweep is only for the tenured objects and is designed to decrease the amount of stop the world GC&#39;s   If these objects</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining Classes Within Methods</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Madhu Siddalingaiah</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13403</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13403</guid>
      <description>... Allocation is only one half of the memory management problem. Sure, heap allocation can be as cheap as stack allocation, but the same can&#39;t be said for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining Classes Within Methods</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:35:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jawabean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13402</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13402</guid>
      <description>... yes, sometimes i feel like &quot;fighting the system&quot;, but there are benefits of using Java as opposed to C&#43;+. i won&#39;t list them here, as those here who</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining Classes Within Methods</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:16:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Sisk</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13401</guid>
      <description>As discussed earlier, the JVM is tuned for short lived objects, in the case of allocating inside a loop the only concern is generating the objects faster than</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining Classes Within Methods</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:59:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keith R. Bennett</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13400</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/novajug/message/13400</guid>
      <description>... Brian - What you say about allocating an object outside of a loop being more efficient is common sense and is almost certainly true. I say almost because</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Jul  5 17:35:06 PDT 2009 -->
