<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ocaml_beginners at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/</link>
    <description>Ocaml Beginners</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Operators and Precedence?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 14:08:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ashish Agarwal</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9747</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9747</guid>
      <description>There&#39;s a table in Section 6.7. On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Robert Fischer &lt; ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Operators and Precedence?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:52:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Fischer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9746</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9746</guid>
      <description>Actually, that&#39;s probably a bad example (could just be rounding up).  Here&#39;s a better one: # 3 + 8 / 2;; - : int = 7 ~~ Robert.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Operators and Precedence?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:47:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Fischer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9745</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9745</guid>
      <description>Thanks -- that&#39;s the list of characters.  Where&#39;s the precedence rules?  It&#39;s obviously got some: # 1 + 4 / 2;; - : int = 3 ~~ Robert.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Operators and Precedence?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:33:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ashish Agarwal</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9744</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9744</guid>
      <description>Section 6.1 of the manual: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/index.html On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Robert Fischer &lt; ... [Non-text portions of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Operators and Precedence?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:51:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Fischer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9743</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9743</guid>
      <description>Where can I find the list of symbols available for operators, and their associated precedence? ~~ Robert.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Share another camlp4 extension: pa_trybind</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 08:07:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard Jones</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9742</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9742</guid>
      <description>Nice language extension and if I understand it correctly it&#39;s completely unambiguous with the original syntax, so it could be a candidate to be added to the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Share another camlp4 extension: pa_trybind</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Zheng Li</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9741</guid>
      <description>Hello, I&#39;d like share another small camlp4 script: pa_trybind [1] , which provides syntax for exception handling in scope of bindings (rather than values). I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: stack size</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 09:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard Jones</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9740</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9740</guid>
      <description>... You should be able to use -cclib to pass options to the linker (via gcc IIRC so you&#39;ll need to use &#39;-cclib -Wl,...&#39;). Use the -verbose option to ocamlopt</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: stack size</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ashish Agarwal</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9739</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9739</guid>
      <description>Thanks. The manual doesn&#39;t seem to have much information on the linking phase. I was hoping -ccopt could be used somehow, but I don&#39;t know which options can be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: stack size</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:05:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William D. Neumann</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9738</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9738</guid>
      <description>On Wed, 7 May 2008 17:56:29 -0400, Ashish Agarwal wrote ... For bytecode, look at section 10.2 of the manual.  In particular, the OCAMLRUNPARAM option.  For</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to optimize combine-function</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Andreas Romeyke</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9737</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9737</guid>
      <description>Hi William, Am Wed, 7 May 2008 10:10:33 -0500 ... Your solution is quite impressive. It is faster than all variants before and does not occupy so much memory. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ocamldoc</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:00:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Florent Monnier</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9736</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9736</guid>
      <description>Hi, I have a module as an implementation file .ml from which I get the .mli interface with ocamlc -i. And I would like to get ocamldoc documentation without</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>stack size</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ashish Agarwal</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9735</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9735</guid>
      <description>Hi all. Is there something analogous to ld&#39;s stack_size option in OCaml? One can set the stack size through the operating system command ulimit -s, but it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to optimize combine-function</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:44:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Zheng Li</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9734</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9734</guid>
      <description>Hello, ... Indeed. ... I agree it&#39;s not as easy as it looks like, especially if you want a generic (for $n$ dimension) purely functional and tail recursive </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to optimize combine-function</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William D. Neumann</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9733</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/9733</guid>
      <description>On Wed, 7 May 2008 09:35:36 &#43;0200, Andreas Romeyke wrote ... By the way, I had one of those head slapping moments this morning when I realized that you could</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu May 15 17:59:07 PDT 2008 -->
