ocaml_beginners at Yahoo! Groups

Re: lwt or ocsigen problem I have no idea

Ashish Agarwal — Tue, 21 May 2013 14:22:11 GMT

... even they exist See the "Support and community" page on ocsigen.org for information about their mailing list and other forums. ... [Non-text portions of

Re: lwt or ocsigen problem I have no idea

Komtanoo Pinpimai — Tue, 21 May 2013 11:23:29 GMT

nevermind, just saw on the manual that Ocsigen_stream.finalize has to be called manually or

lwt or ocsigen problem I have no idea

Komtanoo Pinpimai — Tue, 21 May 2013 05:26:46 GMT

Hi, I should ask this in the Lwt or Ocsigen mailing list but I'm not quite sure where they are or even they exist. I'm running an ocsigen server like a

Re: consensus sapientum

Lukasz Stafiniak — Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:39:00 GMT

... Since always... Although with new features since OCaml 3.12. http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual021.html#toc78 [Non-text portions of this

Re: consensus sapientum

Francois Berenger — Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:25:05 GMT

... Hello, Since when is it possible to do pattern matching on records? I thought a syntax extension was needed for this (some janestreet one). Thanks, F.

Re: consensus sapientum

Gabriel Scherer — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:01:39 GMT

... Silence means "what the heck?". I don't understand any of what you say. Records are built with the { foo = ... ; bar = ... } notation, and deconstructed by

consensus sapientum

Jean Saint-Remy — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:08:45 GMT

Hi, Unanimity of the wise in silence I gather indicates consensus. There is no way to access types when using constructor unless we are talking about the

Re: "ocaml_beginners"::[] batteries StringSet

Sébastien Dailly — Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:42:47 GMT

Le 2013-04-18 07:50, Francois Berenger a écrit : Hello, ... Seems normal, I din't seen StringSet module in batteries :

batteries StringSet

Francois Berenger — Thu, 18 Apr 2013 05:50:47 GMT

Hi, How can I access this module? Here is my trial: ocaml -init /dev/null #use "topfind";; #require "batteries";; module S = BatSet;; (* this works dine *) #

Re: accessing record types

Rémi Vanicat — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:07:06 GMT

... I don't really understand your question, could you show us an example of something that doesn't work for us to comment on? As an explanation, I can say

accessing fields in disjoin union types or algebraic types

Jean Saint-Remy — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:04:23 GMT

Hi, I have researched the topic a bit more in the literature. Jason Hickey describes it in the Ocaml Book under disjoin union types, but some details are left

Re: accessing record types

Gabriel Scherer — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 05:58:24 GMT

I'm sorry, but I still have no idea what your question is. Using a metaphor of databases to describe values in the language maybe doesn't help. On Tue, Apr 16,

Re: accessing record types

Jean Saint-Remy — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:50:17 GMT

I don't know how to adequately describe 2nd order of abstraction here. My apologies for the omission. Typically the 'type' declaration does not involve

Re: accessing record types

Toby Kelsey — Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:10:36 GMT

... No, currying is treating a function which can take multiple arguments as taking one. Here molly and week1 are separate values, each of type db. Usually

Re: accessing record types

Gabriel Scherer — Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:08:16 GMT

Hi, It is rather difficult to know what you are asking for. I don't think there is any link between the (expr : type) syntax and any of what you describe in