ocaml_beginners at Yahoo! Groups

Ocal IDE: Vote for OcalIDE

Hugo Ferreira — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:33:28 GMT

Hello, If you like OcaIDE, please vote for it to show your support: http://marketplace.eclipse.org/node/599 Regards, Hugo F.

Re: getting up and running with godi and batteries

Rakotomandimby Mihamina — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:41:52 GMT

... Distribution package management is one of the strength of Linux. -- Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat: Administration Systeme, Recherche &

Re: getting up and running with godi and batteries

Martin DeMello — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:47:41 GMT

... yeah, it looks very neat :) some packages (lablgl, lablgtk and omake) compiled from pacman but not from godi, but i don't need any of them immediately and

Re: getting up and running with godi and batteries

Peng Zang — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:53:03 GMT

... Hash: SHA1 I'm thrilled you installed GODI! Isn't it awesome? I run Gentoo and for a long time I used the ocaml packages in portage, but it just didn't

getting up and running with godi and batteries

Martin DeMello — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:56:49 GMT

... Ah, the perpetual tension between the distribution's package manager and the language's :) Anyway, I've uninstalled ocaml and packages from arch and

Re: using a list instead of option

Peng Zang — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:02:51 GMT

... Hash: SHA1 I'm not sure how to do it on your system, but with a GODI based OCaml distribution all you have to do is add "batteries" into your "PACKS"

Re: using a list instead of option

Martin DeMello — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:27:23 GMT

How would I use batteries along with OCamlMakefile? (I tried the ocamlbuild way and got nowhere; I've not been able to get mikmatch and ledit working with

Re: using a list instead of option

Lukasz Stafiniak — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:48:47 GMT

You may need some general functions that lack from the basic standard library: let unsome default = function ... let map_some f l = let rec maps_f accu =

Re: using a list instead of option

Martin DeMello — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:04:31 GMT

thinking about it, you're right, i was being silly :) code changed to use option type. martin ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: using a list instead of option

Lukasz Stafiniak — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:36:46 GMT

I think performance-wise the difference is very small. But you should use the option type to express your program's semantics correctly! On Sat, Oct 31, 2009

using a list instead of option

Martin DeMello — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:10:09 GMT

Is there any disadvantage (performance, e.g.) to having a function return [] or [string], and consume it via let collecting traversal = let retval = ref [] in

Re: Combinations with List.fold_left

Till Crueger — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:01:26 GMT

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:14:20 +0100, citromatik ... This would do the trick: let combs elems = List.fold_right (fun heads tails ->

Re: Combinations with List.fold_left

Erick Matsen — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:54:55 GMT

This is probably not the most efficient way, but this does what I think you want to do: let combo ll = let rec aux accu = function ... combo (List.flatten

Re: Combinations with List.fold_left

Christophe TROESTLER — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:53:06 GMT

... Assume you have a function that does the job for a list with n elements (sublists) and write one (using the former) for a list with n+1 elements. You can

Combinations with List.fold_left

citromatik — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:14:25 GMT

Hi all, I am trying to understand how to get all possible combinations of a list of list: # combs [['a';'b';'c'];['1';'2'];['Y';'Z']];; char list list =