onetrak at Yahoo! Groups

Re: New Member

Tom Reid — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:04:26 GMT

I agree with plywood versus dimensional, but would add 2 points: 1. I use baltic birch rather than Home Demo. I have had HD plywood splinter and the plies

New Member

Ralph Grutzmacher — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:20:14 GMT

Terry Let me second John's comments about using good plywood instead of dimensional lumber and a 1/4 inch plywood top with foam. I have one modification and

Re: New Member

terry.pitts@... — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:30:31 GMT

John, Thanks for the input. I get to spend the next year daydreaming about what I'm going to build. :) I have read before of people using plywood for modules

New Member

John Young — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:05:33 GMT

Terry: Glad to hear a new voice on this list. I have a few suggestions for you on module construction (I've built a few...) If you have the equipment, consider

Re: onetrak bridge

Tom Hullett — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:22:37 GMT

All, To link FreeMo to NTrak/oNeTrak standards, you would have to have a trasition module (40") with NTrak standard at one end and the FreeMo Standard at the

New Member

terry.pitts@... — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:47:31 GMT

Hello. I am a new member of the oNeTRAK list. I've been intrigued by this conceptever since I saw it in Orlando (1998?). I really like the free-form concept

Re: Switches.

LARRY R RINEHART — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:15:23 GMT

I use the Peco medium. I have module that has #4's on it and works ok for run thru. Larry ... From: Drew To:

Switches.

Drew — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:54:35 GMT

Hi there, I'm in the process of starting my first first build of a onetrak module and I have a question about switches. Which ones are acceptable for use on

Re: sounds like a very interesting oNe Trak module

Michael Brigham — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:48:34 GMT

... oNe ... Plattsburgh, ... Hi, thanks for the reply.... As for my module, it will not be ready for quite a while at my current rate of speed. I am re-doing

New file uploaded to onetrak

Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:27:28 GMT

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the onetrak group. File : /kcs office

Re: onetrak bridge

Doug Stuard — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:03:30 GMT

NTRAK must, by standards, accomodate just about anything that runs. This particularly applies to DC running and "pizza cutter" wheel flanges. The intent is to

Re: onetrak bridge

Peter — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:30:14 GMT

I guess it is a little bit of "does the tail wag the dog" or the other way around. Depending on who has the "control" (the most modules) at a public show. In

onetrak bridge

Charles Eisener — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:51:30 GMT

When the major difference is a change in module height, it would be easier to either use longer/shorter legs to match the prevailing format, or use a platform

Re: onetrak bridge

Dan Mejak — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:36:24 GMT

I have found it interesting over the years about how many "splinter" groups there are off of the original Ntrak standard. My theory about all the splinters is

onetrak bridge

Bruce G. Alcock — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:25:08 GMT

Ok, I'm going to open a can of worms with this one. I am a member of the Fre-moN mailing list, the N-trak list, the T-trak list, this list and several others.