<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>openpfgw at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/</link>
    <description>Co-ordination of the OpenPFGW project</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Feedback requested for PFGW mod</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:57:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>djbroadhurst</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2080</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2080</guid>
      <description>... Comprehension was indeed the deliberate original intent of OpenPFGW :-) ... Essentially you should set the argument of the -e flag to be the largest prime</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Feedback requested for PFGW mod</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steven Harvey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2079</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2079</guid>
      <description>It sounds like a good idea to me.   Steven Harvey harvey563@... ... From: mgrogue &lt;mgrogue@...&gt; Subject: [openpfgw] Feedback requested for PFGW</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Feedback requested for PFGW mod</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mgrogue</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2078</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2078</guid>
      <description>Now that PFGW is using special modular reduction for k*b^n&#43;/-c and b^n&#43;/-c forms, I was considering a change for the N-1 and N&#43;1 primality tests.  As some of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WinPFGW 3.3.1 is released</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:02:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mgrogue</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2077</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2077</guid>
      <description>This is a bug fix release for WinPFGW only.  The Linux and Mac versions were not affected.  With this release WinPFGW now correctly displays the &quot;Line in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PFGW 3.3.0 has been released</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:48:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mgrogue</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2076</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2076</guid>
      <description>Here are all of the links for PFGW 3.3.0: http://openpfgw.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openpfgw/pfgw_win_3.3.0_20100108.zip </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PFGW 3.3.0 has been released</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:34:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mgrogue</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2075</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2075</guid>
      <description>There are significant behavior changes to this release of PFGW WRT to the handling of sumout/roundoff errors and the use of the -a switch. 1)  The -a swith no</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PFGW 3.3.0 has been released</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:33:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mgrogue</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2074</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2074</guid>
      <description>There are significant behavior changes to this release of PFGW WRT to the handling of sumout/roundoff errors and the use of the -a switch. 1)  The -a swith no</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PFGW 3.2.7 has been released</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:05:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mgrogue@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2073</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2073</guid>
      <description>You can d/l PFGW 3.2.7 for Windows from here: http://openpfgw.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openpfgw/pfgw_win_3.2.7_20100107.zip?view=log Mac and Linux versions</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PFGW 3.2.6 has been released</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:53:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mgrogue</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2072</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2072</guid>
      <description>There was a bug in 3.2.5 with NewPGen file handling.  It has been fixed in 3.2.6, which you can get here: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PFGW 3.2.5 has been released</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Rodenkirch</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2071</guid>
      <description>The Linux and MacIntel builds are now ready.  Here are all of the links: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PFGW 3.2.5 has been released</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mgrogue</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2070</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2070</guid>
      <description>1) Fixed b^n&#43;1 check for using fast modular reduction 2) Some prime numbers silently fail (i.e. no errors detected) when testing for primality.  To address</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: a^b&#43;c much slower than a^b-c</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:25:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Rodenkirch</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2069</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2069</guid>
      <description>Oops, you are correct, it affects &#43;c, not -1 forms.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: a^b&#43;c much slower than a^b-c</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>djbroadhurst</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2068</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2068</guid>
      <description>... On the contrary, it cripples b^n&#43;c, making it 3 times slower than b^n-c. In neither case did I find any error; ... David (after 2500 tests on each form, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: a^b&#43;c much slower than a^b-c</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:59:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Rodenkirch</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2067</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2067</guid>
      <description>... I found the problem.  It only affects b^n-c forms.  I won&#39;t release a patched version yet in case you (or someone else) discovers other problems.  This is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: a^b&#43;c much slower than a^b-c</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Rodenkirch</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2066</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/2066</guid>
      <description>... I don&#39;t know.  I&#39;ll investigate when I have some time.</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Feb 10 02:30:05 PST 2010 -->
