pacificaparl at Yahoo! Groups

Re: "Any and All"

Terry Goodman — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:14:32 GMT

... No, I do not. ... Unfortunately, the distinction between Delegates and LSB Members is not as clear in the approved draft of the Pacifica Bylaws as it

Re: To meet or not to meet?

Terry Goodman — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:51:52 GMT

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Tracy Rosenberg wrote: ... I dissent from this interpretation, but agreement with my interpretation doesn't necessarily mean

Re: "Any and All"

hobces — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:09:53 GMT

Boy-- I'd hate to face you in a court! U do this for a living? I tried to read the Bylaws on this. I was impressed that the Delegates were introduced first,

Re: "Any and All"

Terry Goodman — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:09:01 GMT

On 27 Oct 2009, Albert Solomon wrote: ... Nope. The LSB has no removal authority except for its committees and no recall authority except for its

Re: "Any and All"

hobces — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:16:08 GMT

To ALL: I listened to the Natl Governance Comm last meeting - I can't believe this measure to punitively disempower directors from a particular station is

Re: "Any and All"

hobces — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 07:05:22 GMT

mmmmmmmmm I'm impressed. Good that someone was thinkin' about all that . . . Although Article Five, Section 1(D) states that "all corporate powers shall be

Re: "Any and All"

Terry Goodman — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:16:53 GMT

... Your quote is from Article Seven, Section 4. The LSBs are standing committees of the PNB under Article Seven, Section 1, so are subservient to its

"Any and All"

hobces — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:25:06 GMT

The Bylaws say: ". . . Any and all actions, resolutions and policies taken or adopted by anLSB may be overridden by a majority vote of the Directors if

Re: Carol Spooner's recommend...

LasiewiczN@... — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:06:33 GMT

You're right, Terry. We aren't restricted in using the word "I". It was the word "you" that warrented a warning from the list moderator.

Re: Carol Spooner's recommend...

Terry Goodman — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:12:07 GMT

... I know of no parliamentary rule that prohibits use of first-person. Since a member recognized is addressing the Chair, third-person is used in reference to

Re: [PacificaRadiowaves] Re: Re: Carol Spooner's recommend...

LasiewiczN@... — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:55:37 GMT

In a message dated 10/2/2009 1:53:15 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, LasiewiczN@... writes: I suppose you'd blame Thomas Jefferson for the influence of the

Up-to-date bylaws with citations

cj_gatewood — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:51:00 GMT

Can anyone direct me to a source for an up-to-date copy of Pacifica Bylaws, with citations for revisions? Thank you for your assistance

Re: [PacificaRadiowaves] Re: Re: Carol Spooner's recommendations

LasiewiczN@... — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:53:00 GMT

In a message dated 10/2/2009 1:35:29 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, tgoodman4@... writes: I suppose you'd blame Thomas Jefferson for the influence of

Re: Carol Spooner's recommendations

Terry Goodman — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:35:06 GMT

On Thu Oct 1, 2009, Nalini Lasiewicz wrote: [Terry G:] ... [Nalini L:] ... So, you would blame, say, George Washington or Thomas Paine for all costs incurred

Re: Carol Spooner's recommendations

LasiewiczN@... — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:44:10 GMT

In a message dated 10/1/2009 11:03:53 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, tgoodman4@... writes: Spooner's efforts established rights as corporation members