<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>paleoanthropology at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/</link>
    <description>Paleoprimatology &amp; Human Evolution</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: New file uploaded to paleoanthropology</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:16:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17949</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17949</guid>
      <description>Michael, I must concur. Can anyone tell me, what is the point of this display?? It must have been assembled with an agenda.  But WHAT is it?? best, ~jim</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New file uploaded to paleoanthropology</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:34:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gerard Michael Burns</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17948</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17948</guid>
      <description>... I find this display of photographs not even interesting, much less informative or evidence of anything. Michael Burns</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fwd:  &quot;10 Science Letdowns of the New Millenium&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Grehan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17947</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17947</guid>
      <description>With respect to the statement below: Specifically, the decades-old assumption, always held by the mainstream (so many, that it can be called a consensus,) that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New file uploaded to paleoanthropology </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:02:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17946</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17946</guid>
      <description>Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the paleoanthropology group. File        :</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fwd:  &quot;10 Science Letdowns of the New Millenium&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:55:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Torfinn Ørmen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17945</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17945</guid>
      <description>... It is true that the LCA now appears to have been more human-like in some respects, but there is nothing that indicates that the LCA wasn&#39;t quadrupedal.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fwd:  &quot;10 Science Letdowns of the New Millenium&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:16:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dgplexus1</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17944</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17944</guid>
      <description>Jim, Specifically, the decades-old assumption, always held by the mainstream (so many, that it can be called a consensus,) that the human-chimp LCA was more</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fwd:  &quot;10 Science Letdowns of the New Millenium&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:01:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17943</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17943</guid>
      <description>Sorry Dan, but what is the &quot;consensis&quot; to which you refer? What is the &#39;victory&#39; that your &quot;winning side&quot; mildly gloats about?? If it&#39;s what I think it might</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fwd:  &quot;10 Science Letdowns of the New Millenium&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:18:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dgplexus1</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17942</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17942</guid>
      <description>Congratulations to everyone who was on the &quot;winning side&quot; with me!  There are a few.  :-) Gloating only mildly and in a good-humored way, Dan Gannon ... </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Neanderthals better or worse?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:09:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Anne Gilbert</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17941</guid>
      <description>Lughi: Neandertals do, on occasion seem to have eaten things like fish or birds, and in some places, they probably ate things that came from plants.  At Grotte</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Gona Pelvis</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:24:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>newpapyrus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17940</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17940</guid>
      <description>J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov 26. [Epub ahead of print] Body size and body shape in early hominins - implications of the Gona Pelvis. Ruff C </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Problems with the clock</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:21:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>newpapyrus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17939</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17939</guid>
      <description>PLoS One. 2009 Dec 29;4(12):e8260. Explaining the imperfection of the molecular clock of hominid mitochondria. Loogväli EL </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Neandertal Genome</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:17:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>newpapyrus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17938</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17938</guid>
      <description>Curr Biol. 2009 Dec 30. [Epub ahead of print] A Complete mtDNA Genome of an Early Modern Human from Kostenki, Russia. Krause J </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Neanderthals better or worse?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lughi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17937</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17937</guid>
      <description>On another anthropology yahoo group a person posted a message &quot;perhaps neanderthals aren&#39;t so stupid&quot;  A person then starts bashing the post. All that I know</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fwd:  The foot that may prove &#39;hobbits&#39; existed</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:00:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dgplexus1</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17923</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17923</guid>
      <description>Hi all, Here&#39;s something I just posted in my Flores_Man group.  The article is from earlier this year, but contains some interesting points, and has some</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finger sensitivity between men and women</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>newpapyrus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17922</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/paleoanthropology/message/17922</guid>
      <description>The Journal of Neuroscience, December 16, 2009, 29(50):15756-15761; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3684-09.2009 [ ] Brief Communications Diminutive Digits Discern</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Feb 10 04:35:14 PST 2010 -->
