<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>philosophy-history at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/</link>
    <description>Philosophy-History</description>

    <item>
      <title>History and Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Landon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/1004</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/1004</guid>
      <description>Darwiniana-The Evolution Blog http://darwiniana.com The bottom line on the Darwin Debate Announcing third edition of World History And The Eonic Effect </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Slow reading of Plato&#39;s Timaeus beginning</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:39:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lancelot R. Fletcher</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/1003</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/1003</guid>
      <description>A slow reading of Plato&#39;s Timaeus is just now getting started on my plato-timaeus list. If you would like to join it, you may subscribe by sending email to </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New --Intro</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:17:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vigilius Haufniensis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/1002</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/1002</guid>
      <description>i think SHESTOV is great, but ive only ever been able to find PENULTIMATE WORDS. ... From: &quot;Monica&quot; &lt;instantgrat817@...&gt; To:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New --Intro</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 01:49:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Monica</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/1001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/1001</guid>
      <description>Hello Thrilled to find this site.  Years ago I studied with Prof Otto Pflanze -- a Bismark scholar with a specialty in later years on the Philosophy of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Samuel Butler&#39;s Bull&#39;s Eye</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:55:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>brent@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/1000</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/1000</guid>
      <description>Thanks Richard -- I&#39;ll look for  copy of the book. I was just kidding about the haiku and cartoon but I guess I was asking for a summary of the major ideas of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Samuel Butler&#39;s Bull&#39;s Eye</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Saicho@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/999</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/999</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 2/15/2006 12:04:18 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, brent@... writes: Would  you might presenting a summary of Barzun&#39;s book about Marx,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Samuel Butler&#39;s Bull&#39;s Eye</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:07:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Saicho@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/998</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/998</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 2/15/2006 1:04:02 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, nemonemini@... writes: The  attempt to hijack the debate  using long discredited arguments</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Samuel Butler&#39;s Bull&#39;s Eye</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:03:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nemonemini@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/997</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/997</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 2/15/2006 1:21:25 PM Central Standard Time, Saicho@... writes: Yes, and  in addition, Barzun&#39;s From Dawn to Decadence,  there is a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Samuel Butler&#39;s Bull&#39;s Eye</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:03:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>brent@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/996</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/996</guid>
      <description>Richard -- Would you might presenting a summary of Barzun&#39;s book about Marx, Darwin, Wagner in the form of a haiku or perhaps a cartoon that wouldn&#39;t incite </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Samuel Butler&#39;s Bull&#39;s Eye</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:20:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Saicho@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/995</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/995</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 2/14/2006 6:22:58 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, nemonemini@... writes: One of  the finest critiques of Darwin is Jacques Barzun’s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel Butler&#39;s Bull&#39;s Eye</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:22:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nemonemini@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/994</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/994</guid>
      <description>One of the finest critiques of Darwin is Jacques Barzun’s Darwin, Marx, Wagner (Doubleday, 1942 [sic!]). His work has a clarity that has been lost  in the </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will Free</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:28:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Saicho@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/993</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/993</guid>
      <description>Richard, Maybe  I need to nuance this differently. By &quot;why&quot; I mean reflexive or theoretical.  If philosophy were merely descriptive it would ultimately be no</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will Free</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:24:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Scuiry</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/992</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/992</guid>
      <description>... out ... sense ... asks &quot;Why?&quot; ... single word ... of the mind, ... how the ... works. For me, *why* ... for ... the base of all ... [for lack of a ... </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will Free</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Saicho@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/991</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 12/20/2005 8:50:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, scuiry@... writes: Richard, It&#39;s not (or I&#39;m not, nor are philosophers) taking  common</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will Free</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:52:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Scuiry</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/990</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/philosophy-history/message/990</guid>
      <description>... Time, ... thesis ... the ... to ... well. ... Sure, but aren&#39;t there degrees of this? I&#39;m not saying this fully answers all objections. I think it is a </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Nov  8 15:41:41 PST 2009 -->
