<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>postfix-users at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/</link>
    <description>postfix-users</description>

    <item>
      <title>Impact of SSL renegotiation attacks on SMTP mail</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wietse Venema</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259535</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259535</guid>
      <description>Last week there was big news about a security hole in the TLS protocol that allows a man-in-the-middle to prepend data to a fully-secure TLS session. That is,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>how to increase throughput of postfix to local user?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:01:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stan Hoeppner</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259534</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259534</guid>
      <description>... I absolutely agree with Victor WRT to the spindles issue, as I&#39;ve already stated.  I don&#39;t necessarily agree with his suggestion that you need more CPUs.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to use direct delivery before relay?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:33:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Gering</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259533</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259533</guid>
      <description>Wietse Venema wrote: Mike Gering: Is there a way to configure postfix so that it will attempt to use direct delivery before relaying to another host? Postfix</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to use direct delivery before relay?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:46:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wietse Venema</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259532</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259532</guid>
      <description>... Postfix looks up MX records by default, and can be configured to add an &quot;extra&quot; MX host (with smtp_fallback_relay) that is given the worst possible MX</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to use direct delivery before relay?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:38:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dhiraj Chatpar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259531</guid>
      <description>What i think you can try do is try creating multiple instance of postfix First Instance: Direct Delivery (If rejected forwarded and tried via Instance 2) </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to use direct delivery before relay?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:30:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Gering</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259530</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259530</guid>
      <description>Is there a way to configure postfix so that it will attempt to use direct delivery before relaying to another host? I&#39;ve built my webserver on Amazon EC2</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: how to increase throughput of postfix to local user?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:09:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>devel anaconda</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259529</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259529</guid>
      <description>... Well, actually - not. Yes, it&#39;s mounted with async. I straced the cleanup daemon. Two things slows down HDD&#39;s: write() and fsync() on each message. So, I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sending notification of new mail to cell phone</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>LuKreme</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259528</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259528</guid>
      <description>... procmail. -- Someone&#39;s behind this. Someone wants to see a war. [...] I&#39;ve got to remember that. This isn&#39;t a war. This is a crime. --Jingo</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sending notification of new mail to cell phone</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:51:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>/dev/rob0</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259527</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259527</guid>
      <description>... And your post might make matters worse, as no one can propose any solution without making wild (and likely wrong) guesses about your configuration. ... </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: how to increase throughput of postfix to local user?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:16:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>devel anaconda</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259526</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259526</guid>
      <description>... As I said above - scripts is not the point at a time. If it will, I&#39;ll rewrite them, so my scripts will listen unix socket and I&#39;ll put messages directly</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>sending notification of new mail to cell phone</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:14:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jon Musselwhite</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259525</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259525</guid>
      <description>Hi, I&#39;ve been searching everywhere for this and can&#39;t seem to find a solution. I&#39;m runing a centos 5 server with postfix and cyrus on it and would like to send</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: how to increase throughput of postfix to local user?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:04:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>devel anaconda</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259524</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259524</guid>
      <description>... The problem is not in filters. It&#39;s not the bottleneck for now. The bottleneck for now is moves messages from incoming to active queue. I&#39;ll try to use two</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: how to increase throughput of postfix to local user?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:59:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>devel anaconda</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259523</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259523</guid>
      <description>... Yes. I&#39;ve tried XFS and Reiser4. Ext3 is fastest.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sending an email message based on a subject keyword to an extern</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mouss</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259522</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259522</guid>
      <description>... you can use the FILTER statement in header_checks /^Subject:.*CONFIDENTIAL/	FILTER yourfilterdescriptionhere See FILTER README for how to setup a filter.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Postfix header_checks and HOLD queue</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:50:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Magnus Bäck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/259521</guid>
      <description>On Saturday, November 07, 2009 at 21:10 CET, ... Stop requeueing the message. The whole point of &quot;postsuper -H&quot; is to release the message without requeueing</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Dec  2 19:21:40 PST 2009 -->
