<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>progstone at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/</link>
    <description>The Programmer&#39;s Stone</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Logic puzzle and koan</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:12:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Dodd</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12639</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12639</guid>
      <description>... Well, what I actually I postulated was a perpetual stasis machine where nobody does anything and lots of banks fail, but I certainly implied that the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Logic puzzle and koan</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:02:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Langasek</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12638</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12638</guid>
      <description>... What you&#39;ve postulated is a perpetual motion machine, where these banks will never fail because they can borrow more money, and they can always borrow more</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Logic puzzle and koan</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:55:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Dodd</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12637</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12637</guid>
      <description>... Well, yes, that bit was rather tongue-in-cheek. I&#39;m enjoying the moment myself (no doubt only briefly, until all this finds a way of intruding upon my own</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Logic puzzle and koan</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>test_for_echo2003</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12636</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12636</guid>
      <description>... No.  I&#39;m afraid that&#39;s a bit of a simplification. First, I don&#39;t agree schadenfreude neccessarily represents low spiritual development -- one sometimes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Logic puzzle and koan</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Dodd</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12635</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12635</guid>
      <description>See if you can get your heads (or your AIs) around this one: Postulate 1: Banks are reluctant to lend to other banks because they&#39;re worried that the other</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emotional components of knowledge</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Dodd</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12634</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12634</guid>
      <description>... I really like that, but perhaps it should be pointed out that this depends on your starting position: certainty v uncertainty, or perhaps security v.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emotional components of knowledge</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:50:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>obenchainr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12633</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12633</guid>
      <description>... of, ... Just a quick reminder that &quot;the map is not the territory&quot;.  It&#39;s possible to have multiple concepts of the same thing and have them all be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emotional components of knowledge</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:46:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Theodore H. Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12632</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12632</guid>
      <description>... http://elfdata.com/temp/5levels.png ... Not too abstract. It&#39;s just something you don&#39;t experience enough of, or spend enough time trying to get those</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emotional components of knowledge</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Theodore H. Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12631</guid>
      <description>... I won&#39;t answer the entire email as it&#39;s long. The ability to do logic comes from evolution. But once we got there, to that level, we don&#39;t need evolution</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emotional components of knowledge</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:04:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Dodd</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12630</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12630</guid>
      <description>... I&#39;m beginning to suspect we may actually be in violent agreement .. I think the slowness in &quot;evolution&quot; is actually down to the predictable bits of reality</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emotional components of knowledge</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:17:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Theodore H. Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12629</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12629</guid>
      <description>... It&#39;s possible to think in an evolution-like way. However... this doesn&#39;t get you very far very fast. With logic, you can just leap to the correct answer.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emotional components of knowledge</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:13:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Dodd</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12628</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12628</guid>
      <description>... I&#39;m not convinced there&#39;s a difference. There is something very evolution-like about thought and problem-solving, though obviously it happens much faster.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emotional components of knowledge</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:40:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rosie hassall</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12627</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12627</guid>
      <description> Question:If we put emotions into logic and logic into emotions or vice versa  (if this matters  its that Logic creeping in) do we get logic or emotion</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emotional components of knowledge</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:58:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Theodore H. Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12626</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12626</guid>
      <description>... Also... as for &quot;quantum wierdness&quot;... I&#39;d say that you are looking on the wrong track. Humans really are free. As is all life. I would say that all life</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emotional components of knowledge</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:33:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Theodore H. Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12625</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/progstone/message/12625</guid>
      <description>... Hi Steve, the way I see it is this: You can&#39;t create a life form in code. It&#39;s impossible to make a program that can sense or see or feel emotions or make</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Oct 11 04:55:30 PDT 2008 -->
