<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>prominence at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/</link>
    <description>Topographic prominence discussion</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: 2 more AZ summits</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:54:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert W Packard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5817</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5817</guid>
      <description>Nov 15 with Andy Martin:  Jerusalem Mt (5294, P=1014+).  9.25h, 11m, 3300f. We camped for this on BLM land just north of the Gila River and just south of the </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>P4000 cell map</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:50:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adam Helman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5816</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5816</guid>
      <description>The P4000 foot cell map is indeed a &quot;Mercator-like&quot; projection in that the pixel distance between meridians of longitude is independent of latitude. (However,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P4000 map projection</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:05:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adam Helman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5815</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5815</guid>
      <description>Sound like no specific projection can be assigned to your quiltwork, Eric  8-). If the southern and northern edges of each quadrangle are &quot;forced&quot; to maintain</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NE, IL, and the state of county prominence lists</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:34:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Edward &quot;7.389056099&quot; Earl</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5814</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5814</guid>
      <description>... I don&#39;t see how the final map could be Lambert conformal conic. That projection would have made the US/Canada border curved. You are almost certainly right</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NE, IL, and the state of county prominence lists</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:21:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eric Noel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5813</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5813</guid>
      <description>Hello, I&#39;m not sure I have a good answer to your question. That P4000 map was made using TOPO which essentially sews together various USGS quads, either 7.5</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE, IL, and the state of county prominence lists</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adam Helman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5812</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5812</guid>
      <description>Hello Roy, I do NOT consider 200 feet to be an overly small cutoff prominence! It IS what it IS....and appears to be a good (albeit arbitrary) value for SOME</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NE, IL, and the state of county prominence lists</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Roy Schweiker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5811</guid>
      <description>... Depends on how much private or secure property there is. I started on CT but decided it was more trouble than it was worth. And even using what Adam</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE, IL, and the state of county prominence lists</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adam Helman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5810</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5810</guid>
      <description>Hello Edward, Thanks for all of the answers. To answer your implied question, Acme.com employs the WGS84 datum. ... To all:  a  **conformal** projection</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NE, IL, and the state of county prominence lists</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:24:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Edward &quot;7.389056099&quot; Earl</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5809</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5809</guid>
      <description>... Not quite. I usually generated a complete prom list for the state down to some higher cutoff, and noting the county of each peak that appeared. Eventually,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE, IL, and the state of county prominence lists</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adam Helman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5808</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5808</guid>
      <description>... I  will likely never find myself bagging prominences in the national&#39;s heartland - but that&#39;s hardly the point. How many of us are willing to devote</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE, IL, and the state of county prominence lists</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:53:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Edward &quot;7.389056099&quot; Earl</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5807</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5807</guid>
      <description>I have compiled partial county prominence lists for NE and IL, down to 200&#39;. Results are posted on my county prom site: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Round Mountain, WA</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken R</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5806</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5806</guid>
      <description>I bagged this mighty P4k on October 24, 2009.  The overcast was thick and I was frequently in it. As I was driving in on FS 1850, I noticed a path beaten into</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 NC 50 finest, 1 CO P2k</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:58:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dillmore</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5805</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5805</guid>
      <description>I was able to fit some prominence peaks into some recent family trips. October 17, 2009 Little Pisgah Mountain (4,412&#39;, P1752) NC and Southeast 50 finest The</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 AZ summits</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:10:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert W Packard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5804</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5804</guid>
      <description>It&#39;s November, so I thought I&#39;d head south for a few AZ summits.  I had 4 on my to do list. Nov 1: Climbed Pinyon Mt (5268, P=868), south of Roosevelt Lake.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: hypoxic training expeditions??</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:46:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wererichertoo</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5803</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prominence/message/5803</guid>
      <description>... I am surprised that nobody in this group has yet mentioned the Nike Oregon Project, which started out as a high profile project to train American runners</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Nov 24 00:49:02 PST 2009 -->
