<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>qm2 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/</link>
    <description>quantum mechanics re-examined</description>

    <item>
      <title>google/dwave connection</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:47:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10684</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10684</guid>
      <description>hi all, whats new?? have been pretty busy but still like to follow the qm developments as much as possible. heres two articles on a dwave connection to google.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Einstein&#39;s photon</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:18:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10683</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10683</guid>
      <description>Einstein&#39;s photon To see why we have it and what space and time are, please click link below and read: http://www.amperefitz.com/photon.htm </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why do we have the principle of equivalence ?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:36:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10682</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10682</guid>
      <description>Why do we have the principle of equivalence ?   Or why is the gravitational force the same as an apparent acceleration?   See: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1st programmable qm cpu</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10681</guid>
      <description>Scientists create the first programmable quantum processor A new system uses an entangled two-qubit quantum gate alongside a single-qubit gate to create a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>refs, classical analogs of qm experiments</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:00:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10680</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10680</guid>
      <description>hi, a cohort saw those two papers I posted on classical analogs of bell experiments &amp; the one by joy christian .. &amp; turned up these from the literature which</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Periodic Matrices of subatomic particles</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10679</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10679</guid>
      <description>The subatomic particles can be arranged into a series of square matrices. http://www.members.shaw.ca/doulting/Home_files/ Topics 15, 16, and 17.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>links</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:44:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10678</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10678</guid>
      <description>1st link is a very impressive NIST experiment by wineland et al that can do pairwise operations. basically, a rudimentary general purpose qm computer. &quot;sets a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>recent qm links</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10677</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10677</guid>
      <description>Quantum Cryptography for the Masses A new partnership will make quantum cryptography more widely available. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>computing via classical harmonic oscillators</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:03:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10676</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10676</guid>
      <description>hi all as many of you know Ive long been tormented by analogies of qm to classical physics. there are some eerie correspondences. and of course bohr was one of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>t&#39;hooft playing with CAs</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 03:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10675</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10675</guid>
      <description>hi all, nobel winner t&#39;hooft who has written papers favorable to LHV theories has a new paper promoting CAs, ala wolfram. as an explanation for nondeterminism.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>qm computer links</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10674</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10674</guid>
      <description>Scaling Up a Quantum Computer A series of sustained quantum operations shows promise for developing a practical device. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>qm news</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10673</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10673</guid>
      <description>1st is experimental evidence that electrons can be SPLIT.. breakthru work. possibly of use to computing. 2nd seems to suggest limitations on QM computers. if</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Getting a theory of everything by ditching tenet of physics</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:38:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Hobby</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10672</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10672</guid>
      <description>... ... Vznuri-- Hi.  You posted a similar article about a week ago, I believe.  It got me to hunt down the article by Klammer and Steinacker.  It&#39;s somewhat</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Getting a theory of everything by ditching tenet of physics</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10671</guid>
      <description>thought this an interesting article Getting a theory of everything by ditching tenet of physics A few recently published papers indicate that the long-running</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>new einstein papers released</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:48:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10670</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10670</guid>
      <description>hi all, this has an excellent update on a key question Ive wondered about, out loud in this blog I believe. did einstein know about the michelson morely</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Feb 13 20:35:34 PST 2010 -->
