<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>qm2 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/</link>
    <description>quantum mechanics re-examined</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Getting a theory of everything by ditching tenet of physics</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:38:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Hobby</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10672</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10672</guid>
      <description>... ... Vznuri-- Hi.  You posted a similar article about a week ago, I believe.  It got me to hunt down the article by Klammer and Steinacker.  It&#39;s somewhat</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Getting a theory of everything by ditching tenet of physics</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10671</guid>
      <description>thought this an interesting article Getting a theory of everything by ditching tenet of physics A few recently published papers indicate that the long-running</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>new einstein papers released</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:48:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10670</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10670</guid>
      <description>hi all, this has an excellent update on a key question Ive wondered about, out loud in this blog I believe. did einstein know about the michelson morely</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>qm cpu</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:30:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10669</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10669</guid>
      <description>hi all, this qm cpu thing is going way slower than I thought, but heres some tangible progress. they use a lot of atoms that cohere.. dont know if this could</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How ,,induction lamp works and absurdities of quantum hypothesis</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:38:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>sorincosofret</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10668</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10668</guid>
      <description>How ,,induction&#39;&#39; lamp works and absurdities of quantum hypothesis The induction lamp mechanism contradicts both classical electromagnetism and quantum theory.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Absurdities of a wave model for light</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:37:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>sorincosofret</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10667</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10667</guid>
      <description>Absurdities of a wave model for light A new text is presented at: http://www.elkadot.com/corpuscular/Absurdities%20of%20a%20wave%20model%20for%20light.htm The</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does a smaller light speed in a medium rule out the wave theory of l</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:37:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>sorincosofret</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10666</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10666</guid>
      <description>Does a smaller light speed in a medium rule out the wave theory of light? The light speed measured by Foucault in water does not fit with a wave theory of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>quantum mysticism</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:32:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10665</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10665</guid>
      <description>Does mysticism have a place in quantum mechanics today, or is the idea that the mind plays a role in creating reality best left to philosophical meditations?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Getting a theory of everything by ditching tenet of physics</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:59:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10664</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10664</guid>
      <description>heres a link on new TOE work.. any reactions? Getting a theory of everything by ditching tenet of physics </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>recent promising papers on arxiv</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:01:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10663</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10663</guid>
      <description>hi all, I dont have a lot of time to go thru papers, but it always gives me pleasure to go thru arxiv periodically. I cant be a researcher at a university,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>speed of gravity Re: [Cosmology_and_Astrophysics] Re: Action at a di</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:58:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Whitescarver</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10662</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10662</guid>
      <description>Since the speed of gravity is local to the earth at the speed of light, c, and it is local to the moon at c, its total speed is 2c. Einstein considered the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Theoretical_Physics] Defect of principle of conservation of ene</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Whitescarver</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10661</guid>
      <description>Energy is a relative notion.  It is the rate of quantum logical kinetic clocking perceived by perspective.  There is no clocking of quantum logical kinetics</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Theoretical_Physics] Re: Compactification and a huge question</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:37:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Whitescarver</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10660</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10660</guid>
      <description>&quot;Are antisymmetric tensors equivalent to a psuedoscalar?&quot; Exceptionally well put!  I have been struggling with equivalence of space, time, energy and mass</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lightning &amp; Modern Airliners</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10659</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10659</guid>
      <description>Lightning &amp; Modern Airliners June 2, 2009 http://www.amperefitz.com/aclight.htm &lt;http://www.amperefitz.com/aclight.htm&gt; Modern airliners are far more likely to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>which is deeper, info or physics?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:17:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>V.Z. Nuri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10658</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/qm2/message/10658</guid>
      <description>this is a thought provoking analysis &amp; article. it proposes that information is more fundamental than physics, that physics derives from information handling,</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Jul 11 09:30:00 PDT 2009 -->
