<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>rdfgateway at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/</link>
    <description>rdfgateway</description>

    <item>
      <title>RdfEntity</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:26:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Colquhoun</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1056</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1056</guid>
      <description>Hi, I am trying to use RdfEntity and am having some problems. Basically, I am trying to create an EntityModel using the RdfEntity regression testing code</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Semantics.SDK 1.0.10 Now Available for Download</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cbbischoff</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1055</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1055</guid>
      <description>Great!   Thanks for the information Aaron. Chris</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Semantics.SDK 1.0.10 Now Available for Download</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:30:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Aaron Weiker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1054</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1054</guid>
      <description>SP1 of IMM will have the newer SDK that has these fixes in it. In the meantime to get around it you can do myItem.SetLiteralValue&lt;string&gt;( </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Semantics.SDK 1.0.10 Now Available for Download</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:15:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cbbischoff</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1053</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1053</guid>
      <description>Justin, We are currently using Microsoft&#39;s Interactive Media Manager.   I am having trouble storing DateTime values in RDF and it appears to be related to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Permission set for assemblies installed to SQL Server CLR</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Geoff Chappell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1052</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1052</guid>
      <description>The assemblies don&#39;t call any external code but do use some clr thread synchronization features which force them to be registered as trusted/unrestricted.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Permission set for assemblies installed to SQL Server CLR</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jay.funnell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1051</guid>
      <description>By default the Semantic.Server assemblies are installed to SQL Server with the &#39;unrestricted&#39; permission set.  Will the assemblies still run if the permission</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Azure</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:37:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Geoff Chappell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1050</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1050</guid>
      <description>We did some exploratory datasource work with earlier versions of msft&#39;s SSDS (back when they  supported just the container/entity model). The result wasn&#39;t too</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Azure</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:12:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jjrosen1126</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1049</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1049</guid>
      <description>We are trying to connect the Intellidimension triplestore service so that it can use the Azure SQL service.  Has anyone tried this before?  I&#39;m pretty new to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OwlDataSource initial reasoning</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:15:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Geoff Chappell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1048</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1048</guid>
      <description>Hi Alexander, I took a look at the pizza ontology. You&#39;re right that we will miss inferences in that ontology and you&#39;re right that it has to do with </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multithread reasoning</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Prueitt</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1047</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1047</guid>
      <description>Yes.  The software development kit also is entangled with queries and rules.    This is not the case with RDF Gateway repository. So where as there are things</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multithread reasoning</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:12:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Geoff Chappell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1046</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1046</guid>
      <description>In our system, a query and rules is compiled into a set of operations against sets of tuples. Those operations are separated into layers by the compiler -</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Semantics.SDK reasoner performance</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Geoff Chappell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1045</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1045</guid>
      <description>We don&#39;t really have any numbers like that - other than some lubm w/inference results done against an earlier version of our product. The nci ontology is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multithread reasoning</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:00:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Sidorov</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1044</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1044</guid>
      <description>As I know rule-based reasoners (in contrary to semantic tableu-based reasoners) can make multithread reasoning (Owlim is a good example of such an approach).</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Semantics.SDK reasoner performance</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 07:27:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Sidorov</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1043</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1043</guid>
      <description>Today I made a stress test to Semantics.SDK and Jena&#43;Pellet using NCI Thesaurus ontology. The task was to load the ontology and execute one SparQL query. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SparQL query results</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:14:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eric Schoonover</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1042</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rdfgateway/message/1042</guid>
      <description>guid:_.... is how blank nodes are stored in Intellidimensions products.  If you serialize a datasource to RDF/XML or any other format those values will be</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Jul 11 21:19:51 PDT 2009 -->
