reformed-epistemology at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Plantinga articles online

paulmanata — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:18:41 GMT

And his WCB is online too: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/plantinga/warrant3.html

Re: Plantinga articles online

James Anderson — Tue, 05 May 2009 05:45:05 GMT

Again, this may be old news to some here, but a good number of Plantinga's published articles are freely available on his faculty page:

Apologetics wiki needs some reformed epistemology

Charles Hill — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:32:51 GMT

Hi everyone, I was wondering if anyone would like to edit an article or two about reformed epistemology on a new apologetics wiki. The wiki is found at

Re: Nunley's Defense of EAAN

Chuck Bearden — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:53:20 GMT

... Thanks for posting that link. If you remove the filename from the URL, you get a page which includes the public abstract, and which also links to the full

Re: Naturalism Defeated

Michael Sudduth — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:02:59 GMT

... Vern, The real issue is not whether one can psychologically doubt all of one's beliefs (much less *claim* to doubt all of one's beliefs), but whether one

Nunley's Defense of EAAN

paulmanata — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:22:15 GMT

I checked around via the search engine and did not see Troy Nunley's doctoral dissertation in defense of EAAN posted here, forvive me if this is a re-post.

Re: Naturalism Defeated

paulmanata — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:21:55 GMT

... Hi Vern, My claim is that all of them would admit to paradigmatic cases of defeat. So long as a cognizer continues to hold the conjunction of, say,

Re: Justification and truth

James Anderson — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:39:33 GMT
... Okay. But how is that relevant to the cogency of Bergmann's argument against internalism? James

Re: Justification and truth

James Anderson — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:39:10 GMT
... Chuck, 'A Dilemma for Internalism' used to be on Bergmann's website, but I see that it's no longer there (presumably because it's been published).

Re: Justification and truth

Michael Sudduth — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:18:50 GMT
... Vern, Did you actually argue this point on this list? I don't recall seeing it. Michael [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Justification and truth

Vern Crisler — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:59:22 GMT
... Hi James, As I've stated before on this list, I think Bergmann epistemology confuses content and concept. Vern

Re: Naturalism Defeated

Vern Crisler — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:59:13 GMT
... Hi Paul, What I was trying to say, however badly expressed, is that people can be held to their premises. A Darwinist, for instance, can claim that

Re: Justification and truth

Chuck Bearden — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:58:26 GMT
... I agree that we can't infer explanatory priority from necessary conditionality on a purely logical basis. I suppose I was writing from unspoken intuitions

Plantinga articles online

James Anderson — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:58:21 GMT
This may be old news to others, but I just stumbled upon this collection of Plantinga articles:

Re: Justification and truth

James Anderson — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:25:27 GMT
... This doesn't seem right to me. Vern's claim, in essence, is that (necessarily) all justified beliefs are true; which is to say, truth is a necessary