revInterop at Yahoo! Groups

Re: keywords

Mark Wieder — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:14:18 GMT

David- ... Hmmm. That sounds interesting. Can you elaborate on that? -- -Mark Wieder mwieder@...

Re: keywords

David Bovill — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:22:12 GMT

I write the uRip properties in a script Metadata header - on compile this is saved as a uRIP - that way I never need to check the custom properties because I

Re: keywords

Trevor DeVore — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:02:39 GMT

... I would vote for not changing it. The Rev behavior in the PI is troublesome for more than just uRIP settings and needs to be fixed. Also, I think getting

Re: keywords

David Bovill — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:16:57 GMT

OK - that's 2:1 in favour of change. I'm fine if others want to change this. 2009/7/29 Mark Wieder ... NB - a couple of questions and

Re: keywords

Mark Wieder — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:18:35 GMT

David- Well, I'm not keen on changing it either, but if we want to encourage people to use the standard then we probably shouldn't have roadblocks like this. I

Re: keywords

David Bovill — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:42:59 GMT

I use uRIP ["name"] pretty extensively by now - not keen on changing it just to get around RevIDE issues. If we did I guess, I'd go for a "type-of-component"

keywords

Mark Wieder — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:07:42 GMT

hi- Recently the rev IDE's property inspector has gotten a bit over-zealous about not allowing keywords as custom property names (filed as BZ #8186), even if

Re: IDE Interoperability

Tereza Snyder — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:41:52 GMT

... . . . ... A shame. Despite the virtues of GLX2, I long for the project editor (stack/object browser with search) and customized contextual menus of Galaxy.

Re: IDE Interoperability

David Bovill — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:43:29 GMT

Similarly I have a number of switches for things like (from memory): - ide_ScriptEditor - ide_SelectedScriptObject - ide_ScriptEditorField which switch

Re: IDE Interoperability

Mark Wieder — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:38:43 GMT

Tereza- ... I seriously doubt it. What I had to implement in glx2 (and this goes back to the heart of the interoperability matter) is a switch like this

Re: IDE Interoperability

Tereza Snyder — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:07:00 GMT

... Hooray! I've been sidetracked for a while into web development with Django and Python etc. in my day job, but now I get to do a proof-of-concept in Rev

Re: IDE Interoperability

Ken Ray — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:14:37 GMT

... That's great to hear, Mark! Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Email: kray@... Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/

Re: Projects

Robert Brenstein — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:52:04 GMT

... Isn't this going into building plist-type structures from OSX? Robert

Re: IDE Interoperability

Mark Wieder — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:13:36 GMT

David- Monday, April 27, 2009, 5:48:55 AM, you wrote: Not to sidetrack the issue of an plugin interoperability structure, but the latest glx2 beta (both the

IDE Interoperability

David Bovill — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:50:00 GMT

I'd be real interested in starting to use / develop for the MC IDE, but don't want to have to switch between applications. Here are my thoughts on some future