rhb at Yahoo! Groups

One Man Went to Mow - again!

Mark Trengove — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:31:04 GMT

Now that I am in sight of finishing the English Marilyns, and having decided to tidy up as many of the English Sub-Marilyns as I can before English Marilyn

Corbett Run nearly done

robwoodall@... — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:04:23 GMT

Looks like Manny Gorman is due to finish today, Day 70. Fingers crossed he doesn't fall off his bike again! http://corbettrun.blogspot.com/ Rob Value your

Re: New boundaries

Mark Jackson — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:15:57 GMT

I've done my best with the names. The result can be found loose in the Files section under 'Topo boundaries'. I'm not so good at Scotland, so any advice on

Re: New boundaries

robwoodall@... — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:02:33 GMT

... Alternatively go alphanumeric (for when you do Ireland, etc): could use an internationally accepted system e.g. uk (as in uk001) and ie, or GB etc ... 305

Re: New boundaries

Mark Jackson — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:26:10 GMT

Thanks for the interest, guys. ... A just criticism, to which I offer the following response; RHB 97 regions / 1556 Marilyns = 16.0 Marilyns per region TOPO

Re: New boundaries

jonathan.woods@... — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:48:27 GMT

... from other numbering schemes. ... time in the future might avoid the need for yet another set. FWIW I agree with Martin's (and others') comments above for

Re: New boundaries

Martin Hampar — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:20:18 GMT

Before commenting on the new boundaries, a belated thanks to Richard Webb for his list of P100 (

Re: new release of hills database

Kate and David Baird — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:30:59 GMT

I'll take the opportunity of mentioning my own web database, which has been around for some time now: http://highfielddb.co.uk/gbhills This is also based on

Re: New boundaries

robwoodall@... — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:01:11 GMT

... so we have the UK split into 177 sections, many/most of which are ranges named after the parent peak? I love the concept. There are a lot of them; I

Re: New boundaries

Mark Jackson — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:24:01 GMT

You have it in one Rob. Right, provisional results below; Idea is very simple. Each region is the named peak, plus all its children, unless they've been

Re: 201st member

janet774787 — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:56:01 GMT

Thanks for all the good wishes from afar and to those who joined me on Creag na Criche on Saturday evening! I think both myself and Creag na Criche "emerged

Re: New boundaries

robwoodall@... — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:07:23 GMT

FWIW I agree with Simon that it's best to use a completely different system. Such a system would also enable a more logical ordering, rather than the

Re: New boundaries

Mark Jackson — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:00:02 GMT

Guys, thanks for your comments, and I agree that another load of regions and sections may be annoying. However, I am quite keen on using the parent hierarchy

Re: new release of hills database

pvs193 — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:15:53 GMT

... I've often noticed that when spot heights are on roads that cross cols. The spot height refers to the highest point of the road, not the lowest point of

Re: Scout Hill

Tony Watson — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:16:53 GMT

Thanks to those who sent me info Cheers Tony ... From: "Simon" To: Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:27 PM Subject: