<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>rrax-mustang at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/</link>
    <description>Road Race &amp; Autocross Mustang List</description>

    <item>
      <title>90-93 inst cluster into an 88</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mikelandkroon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36794</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36794</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m wondering if anyone has put an airbag cluster into a non airbag car. I know there are pin out differences and some trouble light differences. I&#39;d like to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FS: Vintage Ford Car Hauler- Race Transporter</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:20:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>LS</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36793</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36793</guid>
      <description>It&#39;s a 1975 chassis, crew cab with stainless ramps and a Warn winch. The side pods under the ramp are storage boxes for tools, tie down straps, extra 2x8</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:52:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>George Kokolakis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36792</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36792</guid>
      <description>Hi Al, I considered the various Watts before settling on the EVM unit. The Griggs was way too massive for me (let alone more money) and the EVM was a minimal </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:51:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>George Kokolakis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36791</guid>
      <description>Hey Peter, Keeping in mind that I have an 86 convertible, the thing is like a brick when it comes to cutting through the air so any change seems to be </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:45:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Hermans</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36790</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36790</guid>
      <description>Just to clarify part of Pete&#39;s comment, I don&#39;t have the EVM Watts link on my car.  Part of this started when I was asking about the EVM Tri-link as an </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:08:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Russell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36789</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36789</guid>
      <description>well, if you&#39;re fast enough and good enough that you could tell the difference in handling between a ranger air dam and the stocker, and a dirty bottom versus</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:14:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>George Kokolakis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36788</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36788</guid>
      <description>Hah, hah, no but sometimes I like to revisit ideas just to see if anything new has come down the pipe. I&#39;ve been running with a combined TA and EVM Watts for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:47:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Russell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36787</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36787</guid>
      <description>well, sure you can.  a torque arm, is de-coupled from whatever scheme is applied to lateral location.  unless you make the ugly mistake of using a torque arm</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36786</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36786</guid>
      <description>Isn&#39;t this what Griggs does in their GR40 setup?  (the higher priced version, the lower priced one uses a panhard bar) They have a TA and a axle housing cover</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:32:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Hermans</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36785</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36785</guid>
      <description>It appears that Griggs has the two combined in at least one of their packaged suspension groups. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:18:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>George Kokolakis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36784</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36784</guid>
      <description>Hi Peter, No what I meant was using a Torque arm AND a Watts link in the same vehicle at the same time. Not comparing them. George. _____ From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Moderator Help</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:30:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>hbennett76@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36783</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36783</guid>
      <description>Is there a moderator for this group that can help me? Please email me at hbennett76@... . Thanks. Howard Bennett</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Axle locating, was  EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mike dono</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36782</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36782</guid>
      <description>   It was hard to tell in that picture. I would have figured that the car would have had a panhard bar...perhaps the class of racing prohibited</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Axle locating, was EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:40:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Russell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36781</guid>
      <description>&#43;1 jimmy, great read.  looking at the rear suspension, it looks like it still depends on the upper diagonals for both: lateral location and pinion angle</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVM Third Link</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:17:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Russell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36780</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/rrax-mustang/message/36780</guid>
      <description>we just did the watts vs Panhard rod thing a few weeks ago, iirc. watts=more complexity and weight, but no arc movement. Panhard rod=lighter and less complex,</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec 17 14:19:19 PST 2009 -->
