rss-board at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

Randy Morin — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:26:03 GMT

All the amendments are approved. Voting Results were 7-0 in favor. For: Querna,Camdem,Parman,Cadenhead,Holderness,Carletti,Morin Against: none Didn't vote:

Re: Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

Randy Morin — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:43:53 GMT

I vote in favor of the edits

Re: Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

Simone Carletti — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:03:54 GMT

I vote +1 for all changes. I just want to share my 2cents about the following edit. ... [10] are extremely short. I'd like to bring them into the

Re: Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

James Holderness — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:15:20 GMT

... In the interests of completeness, I noticed another difference between the two versions of the enclosure use-case document:

Re: Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

rcade — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:04:52 GMT

I vote yes for the proposal.

Re: Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

Ryan Parman — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:23:51 GMT

+1 -- Ryan Parman On Mar 20, 2009, at 4:41 PM, "scamden"

Re: Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

scamden — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:41:22 GMT

I vote in favor of all of these proposed edits.

Re: Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

Paul Querna — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:22:54 GMT

I vote +1 for these changes. Thanks, Paul

Vote: 6 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

rcade — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:09:31 GMT

Today begins the seven-day vote on the six proposed admin edits to the RSS spec. I've restated the proposal in full here: I'd like the board to consider some

Re: Proposal: 5 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

Randy Morin — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:56:14 GMT

Our discussion period on these edit is complete. Rogers, can you summarize the edits in one post and we will begin a voting period. Thanks, Randy

Re: Proposal: 5 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

rcade — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:10:24 GMT

... I don't think so -- the elements are pretty simple and I can't recall any consideration of making them more complex. With Sterling's second, the proposal

Re: Proposal: 5 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

scamden — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:10:16 GMT

In favor. I don't see why this was separate to begin with. Was it expected to be expanded?

Re: Proposal: 5 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

rcade — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:54:05 GMT

Looking at this supporting document ... http://www.rssboard.org/skip-hours-days ... the definitions are extremely short. We could bring them into the

Re: Proposal: 5 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

scamden — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:46:06 GMT

I'm in favor of all five edits.

Re: Proposal: 5 Admin Edits to RSS Spec

rcade — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:36:00 GMT

... This issue came up on our old site at Harvard back when the cloud and item encoding examples were being drafted. All support documents linked from the RSS