<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>rss-dev at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/</link>
    <description>rss-dev</description>

    <item>
      <title>fixed ICE link in spec</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:46:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Aaron Swartz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7448</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7448</guid>
      <description>At the request of some readers, I have fixed the links to the ICE standard in the RSS 1.0 spec. I can&#39;t imagine anyone would object, but I thought I&#39;d let</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Problem with regular expression on rss_utils?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:00:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Poingg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7447</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7447</guid>
      <description>Hi On line 28 of rss_utils, under the function parse_w3cdtf, there&#39;s this regular expression $pat =</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forks and Licensing.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:41:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pkeane_littlehat</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7446</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7446</guid>
      <description>... RSS 1.1 ??  Is that regarded as a viable format (I have not followed this list for very long so I was not even aware of RSS 1.1)? Is it widely supported?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forks and Licensing.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:41:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bill Kearney</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7445</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7445</guid>
      <description>... Heh, brain fart.  That would be version 1.0, the true RSS standard.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forks and Licensing.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bill Kearney</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7444</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7444</guid>
      <description>... Heh. ... That&#39;s why RSS 1.1 has had such great longevity.  It&#39;s very easy to create extensions that fit into the framework.  Now, if you want to create one</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forks and Licensing.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jairus Pryor</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7443</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7443</guid>
      <description>... Masochism, mostly. That, and a need to syndicate fairly specialized statistical data to modified tools that already speak RSS. (Fork is a strong word, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forks and Licensing.</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:13:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bill Kearney</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7442</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7442</guid>
      <description>... Fork?  Good Lord, why? -Bill Kearney Syndic8.com</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Forks and Licensing.</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:12:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jairus Pryor</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7441</guid>
      <description>A quick and easy question, I&#39;m sure it&#39;s been answered before, but searching didn&#39;t turn up anything. The RSS rights statement says: - Copyright © 2000 by the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Call for Proposals: BlogTalk 2008 - The 5th Int&#39;l Conf. on Social So</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:55:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Breslin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7440</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7440</guid>
      <description>BlogTalk 2008 The 5th International Conference on Social Software Cork, Ireland - 3-4 March 2008 http://blogtalk.net/ = Overview = Following the international</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standard for authenticated web feed requests?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:29:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Holderness</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7439</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7439</guid>
      <description>... You can just use the standard HTTP authentication described in RFC2617. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt Regards James</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Standard for authenticated web feed requests?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steven Clift</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7438</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7438</guid>
      <description>Is there a standard that defines how news aggregators should request access to web feeds behind a login/password? Our few private groups -</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Validator Voodoo?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 20:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clinton Gallagher</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7437</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7437</guid>
      <description>&lt;snip /&gt; ... That explains that Klaus thanks. Two more quick questions persist: Is there an XML validator on the web that shows the source that was validated?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Validator Voodoo?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 22:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Klaus Johannes Rusch</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7436</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7436</guid>
      <description>... The W3C validator at http://validator.w3.org/  handles HTML and XHTML but not RSS. As the validator homepage states, there are other services for </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Validator Voodoo?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 22:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clinton Gallagher</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7435</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7435</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m getting results from the W3 validator [1] I don&#39;t understand. I understand what the error message says as it infers the Dublin Core namespace is incorrect</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CDATA the title and description?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 19:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clinton Gallagher</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7434</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/7434</guid>
      <description>... Well Jon, I was thinking of using Regular Expressions to escape the characters but a couple of test cases with the latest IE, FF and OP browsers showed</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Jul  6 02:29:46 PDT 2008 -->
