<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>rss-media at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/</link>
    <description>RSS Media</description>

    <item>
      <title>Proposition for a 1.6 spec of mediaRSS (focus on &quot;category&quot;)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:48:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Colin Moorcraft</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1260</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1260</guid>
      <description>I support all of these points and welcome this thread. My first, quick response, focuses on the proposal to add a &quot;category&quot; attribute to &quot;keyword&quot;. I think</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFC: adding a GUID element to media:content</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:39:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ruudvdl</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1259</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1259</guid>
      <description>... Hi, Sorry for the slow response... 1. I might have been unclear about this. We don&#39;t need more than one media:content. The current structure (media:group</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proposition for a 1.6 spec of mediaRSS</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>michel_plu</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1258</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1258</guid>
      <description>During our work in the Pharos project ( http://www.pharos-audiovisual-search.eu/) , a european collaborative research project, we have been working and have</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [rss-media] Re: RFC: adding a GUID element to media:content</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>forevil@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1256</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1256</guid>
      <description>????????????. ? ?????. ? ??????? ???? ?????? ? ? ????????? ????? ??????? ??? ??????????</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XSD For Media RSS</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Martin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1255</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1255</guid>
      <description>Hello, I&#39;m new to the group but did try to search this out.  There are some answers from one or two years ago, but nothing recently. Is there an XSD for Media</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFC: adding a GUID element to media:content</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:12:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ruudvdl</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1254</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1254</guid>
      <description>... Hi, Sorry for the slow response... 1. I might have been unclear about this. We don&#39;t need more than one media:content. The current structure (media:group</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFC: adding a GUID element to media:content</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:12:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ruudvdl</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1253</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1253</guid>
      <description>... Hi, Sorry for the slow response... 1. I might have been unclear about this. We don&#39;t need more than one media:content. The current structure (media:group</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>multi content with multi thumbnails in one item</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 02:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>abnfire</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1252</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1252</guid>
      <description>basically i have a site like friendsfeed.com and for each feed it can have multiple images or media, cause its group by media type.. anyway thats different</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFC: adding a GUID element to media:content</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:26:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rogers</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1251</guid>
      <description>... A couple of questions so I can understand your idea better: 1. Why do you need more than one media:content object per item? 2. Isn&#39;t the URL attribute of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RFC: adding a GUID element to media:content</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:51:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ruudvdl</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1250</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1250</guid>
      <description>Hi, We feel the need to add a GUID attribute to media:content, to define the uniqueness of a media file. The ability to set a GUID would make it easier to use</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>simplexml_load_string skips the media tag for mrss...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:41:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>aaashi2004</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1249</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1249</guid>
      <description>When i write this: $xml = file_get_contents(&#39;http://api.5min.com/search/how%20to%20make%20a%20chocolate%20cake/videos.xml&#39;); and later i print this $xml</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Media RSS Moves to RSS Advisory Board</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:16:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rogers</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1248</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1248</guid>
      <description>... Thanks. I&#39;m looking forward to digging further into this. The first thing I&#39;d like to do is make sure the Feed Validator can validate all of the Media RSS</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Media RSS Moves to RSS Advisory Board</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:08:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1247</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1247</guid>
      <description>Congratulations! Regarding the &quot;???&quot; in the change notes: I went and looked at the original 1.0.0 file and had this: &quot;Modified &lt;media:thumbnail&gt; to have a url</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media RSS Moves to RSS Advisory Board</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rogers</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1246</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1246</guid>
      <description>The RSS Advisory Board has voted 8-0 to become the custodian of the Media RSS specification: http://www.rssboard.org/media-rss The above link is a draft copy</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>no xsd and you want this spec to be taken seriously</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:38:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>moonpool66</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1245</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1245</guid>
      <description>* rant * How you can seriously call this a specification without an official xsd is unbelievable. How can you possibly expect this to be used for serious</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Fri May 24 09:03:10 PDT 2013 -->
