rss-public at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?

Clinton Gallagher — Wed, 14 May 2008 20:37:45 GMT

The point to be made is that which suggests the pages which RSS Board has published SHOULD BE modified to inform persons of that which we know to be a fact;

Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?

Randy Morin — Tue, 13 May 2008 20:58:30 GMT

I think this is implementation details that can be determined by the aggregator developers. MHO, Randy http://www.therssweblog.com ... narrative" ...

Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?

James Holderness — Tue, 13 May 2008 20:34:32 GMT

The spec itself doesn't say that, but it links to a "use-case narrative" that more or less says so (see http://www.thetwowayweb.com/payloadsforrss). My

Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?

Randy Morin — Tue, 13 May 2008 19:25:25 GMT

Where in the original spec does it say this? Thanks, Randy http://www.therssweblog.com

Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?

Lucas Gonze — Tue, 13 May 2008 19:22:01 GMT

The purpose of an enclosure is defined in the original spec to be prefetching, meaning downloading. On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Clinton Gallagher

Are enclosures downloaded or linked?

Clinton Gallagher — Tue, 13 May 2008 18:41:50 GMT

Roger Cadenhead fixed my subscription up (thank you) as I have asked the following which I present again edited for clarity: Would it be pertinent to indicate

Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?

Randy Morin — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:49:01 GMT

Are you saying we should add an attribute to enclosure to hint to the aggregator whether the enclosure should be downloaded or simply linked to? Randy

Are enclosures downloaded or linked?

Clinton Gallagher — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:40:48 GMT

Would it be pertinent to indicate how the enclosure actually functions since its defining property is a URL which is an actionable element, e.g. some

Not getting daily digest for rss-public

Clinton Gallagher — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:40:48 GMT

I just checked group settings and I'm getting individual mails rather than the digest. Anybody else? <%= Clinton Gallagher

Re: Plus-separated categories

James Holderness — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:30:42 GMT

Yeah, I don't recall ever seeing a plus sign used as a separator, although I have seen it used as a replacement for space (e.g. "lord+of+the+rings").

Re: Plus-separated categories

scamden — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:17:23 GMT

I agree with Randy. '+' is perfectly legal within the text of a category element, and shouldn't receive any special interpretation.

Re: Plus-separated categories

Randy Morin — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:34:50 GMT

It would be incorrect to interpret this as two categories. It's actually one category called "Music + Dreams". Two categories should be two category elements.

Plus-separated categories

Victor Porton — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:52:40 GMT

Somewhere I've viewed an RSS (if I remember correctly RSS 2.0) file with single tag but two categories separated with '+' sign. Something like this:

Re: [rss-media] article about media rss and transmission metadata st

Ryan Parman — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:28:33 GMT

[Cross-posting between lists. Original thread: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/message/1105 ] ... Honestly, I don't know that there IS an

Re: Offering Multiple Feed Formats

Aristotle Pagaltzis — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:38:06 GMT

... At the very least, it should be strongly recommended that if a feed is offered in multiple formats, the `title` attributes of all the autodiscovery links