ruby-nyc at Yahoo! Groups

Rails Dev Needed for NYC BigApps Contest

mike_cavaliere — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:10:11 GMT

Hey all! I've got a great app I'm submitting to the NYC BigApps contest (http://www.nycbigapps.com/). It's partially built, but I need a solid Rails developer

Hackfest!, 11/24/2009, 7:00 pm

Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:07:21 GMT

Reminder from: ruby-nyc Yahoo! Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ruby-nyc/cal Hackfest! Tuesday November 24, 2009 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm (This event repeats every

small project for a big non-profit in midtown

Jacob Hodes — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:25:22 GMT

Hi all, I'm looking for someone to take over a Rails app that I've built for a big non-profit in midtown. It's a relatively simple, staff-facing utility that

Re: rails+hudson?

Karl Baum — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:05:46 GMT

We use hudson for runs of our rspec and cucumber tests pulling from a git repo on commit. We use the git and ruby metrics plugins.

Ruby in Brasil

David Michael — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:04:03 GMT

Thought you guys and gals might enjoy this. http://www.flickr.com/photos/13902208@N08/4118958070/in/photostream/?rotated=1&cb=1258758176993

Re: Dumb question perhaps

Stephen Schor — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:12:01 GMT

Ryan Bates put together a very good screencast on "Include vs Joins": Original Page: http://railscasts.com/episodes/181-include-vs-joins ASCII Cast:

Re: Dumb question perhaps

Aadi Deshpande — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:40:33 GMT

I think the only thing that stands out is that "your" way generates 2 sql queries ( 1 to get the categories, 2nd to get the feed entries from those categories

Re: Dumb question perhaps

John — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:34:52 GMT

Just curious, is there anything "wrong" with the way I had presented it? Is doing it via a join a better / more efficent way of doing it? Thanks for all the

Re: Dumb question perhaps

Stephen Schor — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:13:50 GMT

Kind of tangential but there's a very good gem called bulletthat: *"...will watch your queries while you develop your

Re: Dumb question perhaps

Conor Hunt — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:11:43 GMT

Unless you have giant tables I think that the nested joins/includes are probably fine. Joins if you don't need the associated models: FeedEntry.find(:all,

Re: Dumb question perhaps

Adam Fields — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:50:30 GMT

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 01:07:18AM -0500, Joey Aghion wrote: [...] ... You can always do a find_by_sql if you really need to, though it's not as clean. If the

rails+hudson?

John McGrath — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:31:00 GMT

Does anyone have any experience using a Hudson CI server with Rails projects? Any tools, best practices, etc. you could share? Unfortunately the answer can't

FT Ruby Developer Needed @designerpages

aviflombaum — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:51:16 GMT

Hello Fellow Rubyists in NYC, I'm Avi Flombaum, founder/CTO of www.designerpages.com. We need a fulltime Ruby person. I'm going to spare everyone the long job

Re: Dumb question perhaps

Joey Aghion — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:12:45 GMT

I haven't tried this, but it seems to me that you might want to use a nested ... FeedEntry.find(:all, :include => {:feed => :category}, :conditions =>

Dumb question perhaps

John — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:31:45 GMT

I have a quick question, having a brain fart right now. This is just a personal app I made for managing my news feeds, and I love it, keeps me up to date on