<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>scm-patterns at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/</link>
    <description>Patterns applied to Software CM</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Head-First Maintenance Pattern</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:23:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tbone9992</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1133</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1133</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OWASP Hartford: September 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>OWASP Hartford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1132</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1132</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Head-First Maintenance Pattern</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:46:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tbone9992</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1131</guid>
      <description>Hi All, &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&amp;#13;&amp;#10;Please consider this simple SCM tree&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&amp;#13;&amp;#10;    /---------&gt; V1.0 [---&gt; V1.1]&amp;#13;&amp;#10;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Streamed Lines</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:39:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1130</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1130</guid>
      <description>More thoughts for the discussion..... Perhaps it&#39;s not a change in branching per se, but a dramatic lowering in the perceived cost and risk of branching that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Streamed Lines</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gabor Maghera</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1129</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1129</guid>
      <description>Hi Phil, I don&#39;t meant to be contradictory and I admit that I have not seen the QT repository, but the paper does cover private lines/branches. I think that </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Streamed Lines</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>prlawrence</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1128</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1128</guid>
      <description>... I think it may change things.  I found the branching information very helpful, yet an update to reflect the sort of distributed cloning/forking and merging</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Streamed Lines</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:11:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pgebert299</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1127</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1127</guid>
      <description>That info is as relevant today as it was a decade ago. I have used it in the past when defining code line strategy and recommend the info as part of SCM best</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Looking for toolset recommendations</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:47:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marc S. Gibian</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1126</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1126</guid>
      <description>Hi fellow SCM-Patterns list members, I realize these questions are at best only related to SCM, but I tend to like the opinions of this group of people so</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Streamed Lines</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:35:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gabor Maghera</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1125</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1125</guid>
      <description>It is priceless.  Our company is in process of converging many different SCM systems into one (different tools, different beliefs, different locations).   We</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Streamed Lines</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Yanko, Curtis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1124</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1124</guid>
      <description>I certainly find it useful and given the level of abstraction it doesn&#39;t seem &#39;dated&#39; to me. ========== Curtis Yanko Application &amp; Developer Infrastructure</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More on Stream Lines</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1123</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1123</guid>
      <description>It would be nice to enhance the pattern descriptions with actual usage scenarios.  Perhaps the community could pitch in some examples of how they were able to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Stream Lines</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:38:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Berczuk</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1122</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1122</guid>
      <description>Thinking about this got me thinking about a blog post: http://steveberczuk.blogspot.com/2009/08/streamed-lines-at-11.html -- Steve Berczuk  |</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Streamed Lines</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Julian Simpson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1121</guid>
      <description>I still refer to it, especially the anti-patterns! Wonder if the rise of DVCS systems changes anything. Thanks so much for writing this. Best Julian. ... -- </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Streamed Lines</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:24:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Berczuk</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1120</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1120</guid>
      <description>Hi All, I&#39;ve come across a lot of people who I talk to about SCM patterns who seem very interested in knowing more about branching.. Brad, I and others wrote</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAMP/Web SCM</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:26:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1119</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/scm-patterns/message/1119</guid>
      <description>Hi Folks, In response to Randy&#39;s question and to further Thiago&#39;s discussion: We&#39;ve gone as far as using continuous integration even for config files.  The</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Dec  2 21:26:16 PST 2009 -->
