<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>scrumdevelopment at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/</link>
    <description>Scrum Users</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: back</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:39:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jay Conne</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42587</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42587</guid>
      <description>Hi Paul, I like Ron&#39;s attitude - it fits the context. Re- &#39;My&#39; - People who know me know I care about words (as well as the ideas in Scrum, Agile, etc.) &#39;My&#39;,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Scrum and contracting</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:32:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>George Dinwiddie</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42586</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42586</guid>
      <description>... Niklas, I would absolutely have such a retrospective.  I would also try to judge the level of safety felt by the participants.  It might be that some would</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [!! SPAM]  Re: [scrumdevelopment] Re: Scrum and contracting</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:50:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Rawsthorne</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42585</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42585</guid>
      <description>Or thought they were... Dan Rawsthorne, PhD, CST Senior Coach, Danube Technologies dan@..., 425-269-8628</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: estimating items depending on external consultants</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:49:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Rawsthorne</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42584</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42584</guid>
      <description>Well, velocity wasn&#39;t the question. What was the &quot;doneness&quot; criteria that the Team could have committed to? Can it commit to something that is dependent on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[!! SPAM] [scrumdevelopment] Re: Scrum and contracting</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:48:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42583</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42583</guid>
      <description>I completely agree with Ron. The best experience I had was when the PO was part of the team, being there to answer questions by the team at once, being present</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [!! SPAM]  [scrumdevelopment] Re: Scrum and contracting</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:47:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ron Jeffries</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42582</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42582</guid>
      <description>Hello, Michael.  On Saturday, November 7, 2009, at 5:00:45 PM, you ... Yes. I should think so. Ron Jeffries www.XProgramming.com www.xprogramming.com/blog </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: estimating items depending on external consultants</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:47:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Rawsthorne</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42581</guid>
      <description>Yes, it&#39;s all about commitment. The estimates are unimportant except as they influence commitment. Dan Rawsthorne, PhD, CST Senior Coach, Danube Technologies </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [!! SPAM]  Re: [scrumdevelopment] Re: Scrum and contracting</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:46:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Rawsthorne</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42580</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42580</guid>
      <description>No, you would never invent a *rule* against it. You look for the person who is accountable, and that&#39;s the PO, If this person is on the customer side, that&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [!! SPAM]  Re: [scrumdevelopment] Re: Scrum and contracting</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Rawsthorne</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42579</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42579</guid>
      <description>well, as long as they can be on the team and actually make the decisions. If there is no contractual separation it is possible.When there&#39;s a contract in the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [!! SPAM]  [scrumdevelopment] Re: Scrum and contracting</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:42:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Rawsthorne</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42578</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42578</guid>
      <description>Agreed. But lately I&#39;m seeing such bad code that has to be the first thing addressed, or at least mentioned. Dan Rawsthorne, PhD, CST Senior Coach, Danube</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: estimating items depending on external consultants</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ron Jeffries</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42577</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42577</guid>
      <description>Hello, martin.  On Saturday, November 7, 2009, at 4:48:11 PM, you ... I think it is generally best to timebox experiments to about a half day or day. Ron</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: estimating items depending on external consultants</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42576</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42576</guid>
      <description>... The team was willing, but the PO wanted to know what else he would get during this sprint.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: estimating items depending on external consultants</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:02:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42575</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42575</guid>
      <description>... The team knew their velocity. But the priority of the prototype item was highest, so in order to know *approximately* which items could fit in the sprint</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [!! SPAM]  [scrumdevelopment] Re: Scrum and contracting</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:00:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42574</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42574</guid>
      <description>... Some customers might be more satisfied with the experience if they were in the driver&#39;s seat. --mj</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: estimating items depending on external consultants</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:57:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42573</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/42573</guid>
      <description>... Seems to me the only estimate that matters in this case is whether or not the team&#39;s willing to try it within the Sprint timebox. --mj</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Nov  7 23:30:17 PST 2009 -->
