<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>sdpd at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/</link>
    <description>Crystal Structure from Powder</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: RIET: Acta E editorial on fraudulently submitted crystal structu</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 07:55:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>L_Solovyov</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2467</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2467</guid>
      <description>For smart frauds the PCOD would be the worst tool since it is too obvious. Thus, it should be considered as a database of structures with the least probability</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Position in Brookhaven National Labs</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:14:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Akhilesh</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2466</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2466</guid>
      <description>All: Here is the position again. Thanks Cora. The Medical Department at Brookhaven National Laboratory seeks to fill a Postdoctoral Research Associate</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Position in Brookhaven National Labs</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:51:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cora Lind</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2465</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2465</guid>
      <description>Akhil, what you wanted forwarded got erased! Cora ... ******************************************* Dr. Cora Lind Associate Professor WO 2262 Department of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Position in Brookhaven National Labs</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Akhilesh</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2464</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2464</guid>
      <description>Happy New Year to all One of my friends asked me to post this job position (please see attached). Please contact per the instruction in the attachment. Thanks </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RIET: Acta E editorial on fraudulently  submitted crystal struct</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>armellebail</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2463</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2463</guid>
      <description>... Well tried. But this will &quot;only&quot; give the proof that a structure candidate was a correct prediction. What about the other predictions not confirmed ? Were</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RIET: Acta E editorial on fraudulently  submitted crystal struct</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Chateigner</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2462</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2462</guid>
      <description>I would simply not worry about this, but on the reason why people become defrauders: recognition, employability, impact factor ? as far as our institutions</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RIET: Acta E editorial on fraudulently submitted crystal structu</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:58:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Armel Le Bail</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2461</guid>
      <description>... And as a consequence, our frauds are harder to discover ?-). Maybe... Some people say that the databases of predicted crystal structures will serve as a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RIET: Acta E editorial on fraudulently submitted crystal structu</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:50:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>L_Solovyov</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2460</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2460</guid>
      <description>... Maybe we are just smarter? :)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RIET: Acta E editorial on fraudulently submitted crystal structu</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Armel Le Bail</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2459</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2459</guid>
      <description>Hi, Another recent crystallographer fraud story on 12 protein structures : http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/56226/ One should consider the &gt;50 000</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RIET: Acta E editorial on fraudulently submitted crystal structures</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:50:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lachlan Cranswick</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2458</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2458</guid>
      <description>Hi All, Quickish message for those who have editorial duties and/or review structure papers, where the following Acta E editorial on fraudulently submitted</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems in refinement</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:23:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pranav Bardapurkar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2457</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2457</guid>
      <description>Sir, Thanks a lot! I will try out as per your guidelines and will get back to you..Thanks a lot again.. Pranav ... From: Armel le Bail</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems in refinement</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:21:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>徐君</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2456</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2456</guid>
      <description>Hi, You should check whether the initial parameters for refinement(eg. background ,  peak shape, unitcell dimensions , zeroshift determined from Le Bail</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems in refinement</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Armel le Bail</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2455</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2455</guid>
      <description>... Others possible reasons are - preferred orientation, - or more classic for spinels, Fullprof uses a space group with inversion center at the origin and the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems in refinement</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Radu Baies</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2454</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2454</guid>
      <description>Did you proprely give the ocupancy factors? In FullProf Occ=siteOcc*chemOcc 2009/12/29 Pranav Bardapurkar &lt;pranavbardapurkar@...&gt; ... [Non-text portions</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Problems in refinement</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pranav Bardapurkar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2453</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/2453</guid>
      <description>Dear coworkers... I need your help further...!   I was refining my Li0.5Fe2.5O4 sample with fullprof. After a certain limit, the intensities didn&#39;t change</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Feb 12 20:28:06 PST 2010 -->
