<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>search_dev at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/</link>
    <description>Independent Search Engine Developers</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: XML enveloping in Autonomy</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:31:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Erkan Celme</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/886</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/886</guid>
      <description>you need to have new line characters and urlencode the xml in the action=ImportEnvelope command.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XML enveloping in Autonomy</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:28:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kalyan Srinivas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/885</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/885</guid>
      <description>Here is wht i am trying to do i have a list of XML files and each xml file has associated pdf file,now XMl files have meta-data tags for the respective</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XML enveloping in Autonomy</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:21:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kalyan Srinivas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/884</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/884</guid>
      <description>it looks like this &lt;response&gt;SUCCESS&lt;/response&gt; - &lt;responsedata&gt; - &lt;FILESYSTEMFETCH&gt; - &lt;IMPORTENVELOPE&gt; - &lt;envelope&gt; </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XML enveloping in Autonomy</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:09:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>adi.leibowitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/883</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/883</guid>
      <description>Kaylan, I think you are actually looking at the stub idx created for this PDF file, and not the acutal post import IDX. What does your response look like (the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XML enveloping in Autonomy</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:59:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kalyan Srinivas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/882</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/882</guid>
      <description>Thanks Adi,I was kinda thinking of same,i was confused after wht i read from Autn docs and i thought i should have a second opinion,hence the post,and </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XML enveloping in Autonomy</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>adi.leibowitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/881</guid>
      <description>Kaylan, Below is an example for a working envelope, I think you only need to omit DREENDDOC since this is a stubidx. Let me know if this helps, Adi. &lt;?xml</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XML enveloping in Autonomy</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kalyan Srinivas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/880</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/880</guid>
      <description>Hi All Has any body tried Importing documents using XML envelopes, Here is the sample Data i am working on to get it right for some reason i cannot get it done</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: verity kvoop process in memory</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:27:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>adi.leibowitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/879</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/879</guid>
      <description>Another Interesting fact is that sometimes when the import/filtering process fails, temporary files created by KeyView (kvoop) are left in the temporary folder</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NYC Search in the Cloud meetup: Jan 20</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Otis Gospodnetic</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/878</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/878</guid>
      <description>Hello, If &quot;Search Engine Integration, Deployment and Scaling in the Cloud&quot; sounds interesting to you, and you are going to be in or near New York next</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: verity kvoop process in memory</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wildgoose</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/877</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/877</guid>
      <description>Kvoop is also used in the Autonomy systems as well, and I have also had similar trouble in the past, although not necssarily with Linux. Based on past</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>verity kvoop process in memory</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:03:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rupendra Peddacama</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/876</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/876</guid>
      <description>Rakesh, Kvoop processes are used by the filters while indexing content. Import process must be choking on a huge zip file or some other big file in your</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>verity kvoop process in memory</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:57:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rakesh kumar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/875</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/875</guid>
      <description>Hi All, We use verity search engine and RedHat Linux Version 4. Recently we see that our index queue doesn&#39;t progress forward and there are 2 process that sit</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: maxdocs parameter in Verity Search</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:50:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rakesh kumar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/874</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/874</guid>
      <description>Thanks for the reply. Regards, Rakesh Kumar J. ________________________________ From: miles_b_kehoe &lt;mbk@...&gt; To: search_dev@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: maxdocs parameter in Verity Search</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:48:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rakesh kumar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/873</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/873</guid>
      <description>Thanks for the reply. Regards, Rakesh Kumar J. ________________________________ From: Arthur Gaasenbeek &lt;agaasenb@...&gt; To: search_dev@yahoogroups.com </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: maxdocs parameter in Verity Search</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:49:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>miles_b_kehoe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/872</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/search_dev/message/872</guid>
      <description>Rakesh: Arthur has hit it right on the head, but perhaps by way of example I can offer some clarity. Let&#39;s assuem we have a large collection with 1M documents</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Feb 10 06:55:06 PST 2010 -->
