<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>secession at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/</link>
    <description>secession</description>

    <item>
      <title>terms for sudan referendum approved</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jason Sorens</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2207</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2207</guid>
      <description>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8310928.stm Terms for Sudan referendum agreed Armed man in southern Sudan 23.9.09 More than 2,000 people have died in ethnic</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [goooh-3] Powerful new LIBERTY Website</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ric Ben-Safed</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2206</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2206</guid>
      <description>As Benjamin Franklin said on the last day of the Constitutional convention in 1787. &quot;In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution with all its</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [goooh-3] Powerful new LIBERTY Website</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:36:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dr Andrew J Cleary</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2205</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2205</guid>
      <description>I can&#39;t speak for others but I don&#39;t see how a movement based around &quot;faith&quot; is going to get me involved... The first page says something about &quot;Faith in </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [goooh-3] Powerful new LIBERTY Website</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>aditmore@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2204</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2204</guid>
      <description>One thing I need to mention here as a reminder is that voting machine issues like paper printouts are already highly decentralized, usually decided at the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [goooh-3] Powerful new LIBERTY Website</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:19:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gned the Gnome</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2203</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2203</guid>
      <description>- Interesting idea, including your initial discussion of why the current system is so badly flawed that the normal process may already be beyond repair, but I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Secessionary Times</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott Burger</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2202</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2202</guid>
      <description>http://www.styleweekly.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&amp;nm=&amp;type=Publishing&amp;mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&amp;mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&amp;tier=4&amp;id=28AF83EE52D24DF</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AUTONOMOUS REGIONAL GOVERNMENT PUSH NOW UNDERWAY!!</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:05:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>aditmore@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2201</guid>
      <description>I meant primarily that it can&#39;t be gotten to from here. Once I established that, the other question is moot and so I don&#39;t have to consider it or make a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AUTONOMOUS REGIONAL GOVERNMENT PUSH NOW    UNDERWAY!!</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:41:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gned the Gnome</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2200</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2200</guid>
      <description>- Ultimately you&#39;ve got it right, and it&#39;s called Panarchy, which means multiple competing local gov&#39;t&#39;s in the same territory, no more territorial monopolies.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AUTONOMOUS REGIONAL GOVERNMENT PUSH NOW UNDERWAY!!</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:00:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dr Andrew J Cleary</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2199</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2199</guid>
      <description>Thanks. A few clarifications: It&#39;s not realistic because it realistically wouldn&#39;t work, or because it realistically can&#39;t be gotten from here? What is not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AUTONOMOUS REGIONAL GOVERNMENT PUSH NOW UNDERWAY!!</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:32:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>aditmore@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2198</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2198</guid>
      <description>I don&#39;t consider individual secession to be realistic, though Gned does. Neighborhood secession from big cities is a very important concept especially to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AUTONOMOUS REGIONAL GOVERNMENT PUSH NOW UNDERWAY!!</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:21:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dr Andrew J Cleary</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2197</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2197</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m very new to this list so I have a basic question: Isn&#39;t the whole idea of government based on any contiguous land mass - whether it&#39;s big, like the current</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AUTONOMOUS REGIONAL GOVERNMENT PUSH NOW   UNDERWAY!!</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:00:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>aditmore@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2196</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2196</guid>
      <description>I would prefer districts (and gerrymandering) be eliminated by electing congress statewide by parliamentary system with each party getting seats in proportion</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AUTONOMOUS REGIONAL GOVERNMENT PUSH NOW   UNDERWAY!!</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:21:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gned the Gnome</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2195</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2195</guid>
      <description>- Interesting idea, and a compromise between the current de facto system and the URT&#39;s model. The logical extension of your suggestion, with some of our model</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AUTONOMOUS REGIONAL GOVERNMENT PUSH NOW UNDERWAY!!</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:54:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ric Ben-Safed</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2194</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2194</guid>
      <description>Its simple really.  I&#39;ve just written to my Governor of the &quot;Commonwealth of Pennsylvania&quot; to establish a Commission to determine what the u.s. house </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: molto interessante !</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ric Ben-Safed</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2193</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/secession/message/2193</guid>
      <description>In other words Russell Means is quite happy  with Obama and the Democrats in the Congress.  He doesn&#39;t have a cause anymore. ... From: Fiorenzo To:</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec 17 21:31:27 PST 2009 -->
