<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>snobol at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/</link>
    <description>Snobol</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: LISP and FORTRAN reminiscing</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robin Haberkorn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/940</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/940</guid>
      <description>... hey I&#39;m not denying anything :-) Actually I&#39;m very interested. I have limited experience with FORTRAN 77 (and only used the OpenWatcom dialect) but never</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LISP and FORTRAN reminiscing</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:38:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Richmond</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/939</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/939</guid>
      <description>It&#39;s strange that you would have so many doubts, when I have told you that I *have* written the simulated recursive program using the ASSIGN&#39;ed GOTO.   :-) </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dr. Dobbs CodeTalk: More Technonecrophilia with Snobol One-Liner</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>m.15775</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/938</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/938</guid>
      <description>More articles on Snobol have appeared in Dr. Dobb&#39;s Journal since the one that Rafal cited.  Jocelyn Paine, one of the DDJ Codetalk Gurus, has illustrated</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LISP and FORTRAN reminiscing</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:28:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gordon Peterson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/937</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/937</guid>
      <description>There are a variety of ways to jump to addresses, including several not based on an address in the machine language instruction.  Usually you can also store </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LISP and FORTRAN reminiscing</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:06:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve Wampler</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/936</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/936</guid>
      <description>... To take this even farther afield.  A long time ago when teaching intro FORTRAN I showed the students how to pass a function as an argument, giving the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LISP and FORTRAN reminiscing</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:40:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robin Haberkorn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/935</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/935</guid>
      <description>interesting! ...sorry for intruding into the discussion but could you give an example, please? As far as I can remember, neither it is possible - for good</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dr. Dobbs CodeTalk: More Technonecrophilia with Snobol One-Liner</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:11:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gordon Peterson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/934</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/934</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve uploaded several comments to that article.  ;-) ... -- Gordon Peterson II http://personal.terabites.com 1977-2007:  Thirty year anniversary of local area</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LISP and FORTRAN reminiscing</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Richmond</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/933</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/933</guid>
      <description>... ASSIGNED GO TO can be used to simulate recursion in FORTRAN. I have used it to simulate recursion in processing a sorted tree. -- </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LISP and FORTRAN reminiscing</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:32:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Walker, Radford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/932</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/932</guid>
      <description>From: FredW ... One could argue that the &quot;blank&quot; for pattern matching is a pretty strange symbol in this context.  It has bitten me a few times because I think</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dr.Dobbs CodeTalk Snobol article</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Richmond</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/931</guid>
      <description>... Yes, in my experience, FORTRAN *always* kept the format as a string of characters and interpreted it as the printing was done. At least in *some* versions</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dr.Dobbs CodeTalk Snobol article</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:38:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>FredW</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/930</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/930</guid>
      <description>Yes in FORTRAN IV (&#39;ish, because different vendors had slightly different rules). READ(3,100) WRITE(4,100) 100 FORMAT(10HABCDEFGHIJ) If 1234567890 were punched</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dr.Dobbs CodeTalk Snobol article</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>FredW</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/929</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/929</guid>
      <description>Gordon -- um... Lisp, Scheme, sh (unix shell), my own fbasic interpreter. Just four examples. Take sh as an example - `...` which executes an arbitrary</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dr.Dobbs CodeTalk Snobol article</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:06:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>m.15775</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/928</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/928</guid>
      <description>... &lt;snip&gt; ... It&#39;s almost 40 years later in my case, too, but what I recall is that FORTRAN had an interpretive mode for Format statements.  I worked in an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dr. Dobbs CodeTalk: More Technonecrophilia with Snobol One-Liners</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rms_s4</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/927</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/927</guid>
      <description>Author: &quot;I don&#39;t think I want to imply that Snobol is dead: to me, it has more vitality than Perl&quot; </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dr.Dobbs CodeTalk Snobol article</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:51:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Boyko Bantchev</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/926</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/snobol/message/926</guid>
      <description>2010/1/25 Michael Davis &lt;michaeldavismd@...&gt; ... Yes, it is called Pop-11 and the Poplog system which implements it also implements several other</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 16:43:45 PDT 2010 -->
