<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>solarisx86 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/</link>
    <description>solarisx86</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Installing Software in a Live Upgrade environment</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:27:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Taylor</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50133</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50133</guid>
      <description>Especially with zfs root.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Installing Software in a Live Upgrade environment</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:37:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adrian Saul</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50132</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50132</guid>
      <description>Might be worth a shot trying it with lumount and chroot, depending on how smart/dumb the application installation is. But thats the nice thing with live</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Installing Software in a Live Upgrade environment</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:31:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Deniz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50131</guid>
      <description>Hi, We&#39;ve been trying to figure out if it is possible to install software that are in non-pkg format in a Live Upgrade Environment maybe after doing an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solaris disk confusion ?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:24:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeremy Kister</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50130</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50130</guid>
      <description>... i&#39;ll work on that. ... there are no failed drives. i have a bunch of disks in a zfs pool called dbzpool. i&#39;m trying to create a new zfs pool called newpool</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Certification Guidance</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:51:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Oliver Jones</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50129</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50129</guid>
      <description>Personally, I would disagree. At least, given the employer demand for certifications over here. If you are doing the certification to find yourself a job, look</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solaris disk confusion ?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:50:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Taylor</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50128</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50128</guid>
      <description>On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Jeremy Kister ... I figured as much. ... well, it still stands to reason if cfgadm -al shows the device, that you should try</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solaris disk confusion ?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeremy Kister</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50127</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50127</guid>
      <description>... it&#39;s a very important production host; i can&#39;t easily reboot. ... just fyi, this is scsi u320 on 6 lsi 1030 controllers. i did delete the dev links and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solaris disk confusion ?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeremy Kister</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50126</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50126</guid>
      <description>... it taught me about the file, but unfortunately c12t1 isnt a string anywhere in the file :-/ -- Jeremy Kister http://jeremy.kister.net./</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solaris disk confusion ?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:57:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adrian Saul</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50125</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50125</guid>
      <description>Did my suggestion about checking the /etc/zfs/zpool.cache file help out? Cheers, Adrian</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solaris disk confusion ?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Taylor</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50124</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50124</guid>
      <description>On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Jeremy Kister ... You haven&#39;t rebooted have you? I just had one of my coworkers run into the same thing after he changed a few</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solaris disk confusion ?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:47:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeremy Kister</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50123</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50123</guid>
      <description>... So I just installed a brand new disk in c12t1.  I still get this error, so it clearly has nothing to do with pre-existing zfs labels on the disk. i&#39;ve</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCSI initiator ID</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:13:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Phillip Bruce</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50122</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50122</guid>
      <description>... I forgot to add check the vold.conf file it will contain that as well see below: (4.4) What are SCSI IDs expected by Solaris x86? These are the typical</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCSI initiator ID</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Phillip Bruce</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50121</guid>
      <description>... What you have to do is configure the HBA your using. Wait until the system boots and then do a ^ Q or ^S depending vendor to bring up the HBA Bios program.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCSI initiator ID</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:58:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Banks</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50120</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50120</guid>
      <description>Does anyone know how to change a SCSI initiator id in Solaris x86?  It&#39;s easy on SPARC, but the lack of OBP/nvram takes away all of my directly transferrable</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Solaris Patches available at riddleware.com 20091107</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:39:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patch Nag</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50119</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/50119</guid>
      <description>137081-04    SunOS 5.10_x86: libpng Patch</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec 17 01:50:46 PST 2009 -->
