<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>spiderbeam at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/</link>
    <description>SPIDERBEAM</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: RG-58 for Spider elements?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:13:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Milton Riutort</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1698</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1698</guid>
      <description>G1OXW: I need to say that you received a variety of comments and almost no good one and I agree. You may explore how to fabricate a dipole with your RG58 and </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RG-58 for Spider elements?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:59:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>VR2BrettGraham</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1697</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1697</guid>
      <description>... Responses so far missed that what you propose to do is effectively using the coax as a large diameter wire. The velocity factor you quote (which would need</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RG-58 for Spider elements?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:12:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>DF4SA</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1696</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1696</guid>
      <description>Hi Steve, unfortunately the concept that you can use coax cable for wire elements and thus shorten the lengths by the velocity factor is wrong, even though it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RG-58 for Spider elements?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:08:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rick Westerman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1695</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1695</guid>
      <description>2 points: 1.      If you use anything except the exact same wire Spiderbeam uses (CQ532), you will spend an awful lot of time adjusting element lengths. And, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RG-58 for Spider elements?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:03:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>aa4nn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1694</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1694</guid>
      <description>The spreaders will most likely collapse under the weight of the coax. de Joe, AA4NN ... From: G1XOW Steve To: spiderbeam@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RG-58 for Spider elements?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:49:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>G1XOW Steve</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1693</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1693</guid>
      <description>... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Business Plan</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:06:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>janaakki@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1692</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1692</guid>
      <description>Acting</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Friedrichshafen??</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:51:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Igor Sokolov</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1691</guid>
      <description>Con, can you take a bag of spiderbeam insulators (30-40 of them) to F-hafen. I need them for my new project. I will ask DL6XK to collect them. He is going to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Friedrichshafen??</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:02:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>DF4SA</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1690</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1690</guid>
      <description>Hi Bob, yes we will be present on the HAMRADIO trade show. We are having a joint booth again with APPELLO. Our booth number is A1-413 and we will appreciate</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: spiderbeam antenna for 477mhz UHF? - please help</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:32:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>greenhornet_au</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1689</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1689</guid>
      <description>Thanks for that Joe, I thought that yagi antennas are very directional in their use and while that is fine for point to point, my use is not so defined. Having</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: &quot;Copperweld Wireman CQ-532&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:31:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>iz7fmm Alex</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1688</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1688</guid>
      <description>We have to test it with something like MFJ-259b...the CQ532 vs nude copper wire 1mm... so we can say exsately the velocity factor on real use. I could test it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: &quot;Copperweld Wireman CQ-532&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:59:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Igor Sokolov</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1687</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1687</guid>
      <description>I have just put up 10m dipole to check on the velocity factor of CQ532 wire. My measurements show something between 0.94 and 0.95 That is calculated against</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Friedrichshafen??</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:35:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1686</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1686</guid>
      <description>Hi Con, will you be at the Ham Messe this year? 73 Bob, I2WIJ</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: spiderbeam antenna for 477mhz UHF? - please help</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:02:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Aldridge</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1685</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1685</guid>
      <description>Joe, Ron says he is uninitiated where antennas are concerned and will probably require some detailed construction help. Personally, at the 440 MHz range, Ron</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: spiderbeam antenna for 477mhz UHF? - please help</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joe, aa4nn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1684</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/message/1684</guid>
      <description>Hi Ron, It seems to me you would be much better off and would have better forward gain if you made a portable antenna using lightweight aluminum.  For</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Jul 11 20:51:49 PDT 2009 -->
