spki at Yahoo! Groups

Re: problem with the death of X.509 PKI

Peter Gutmann — Thu, 05 Jul 2001 04:55:47 GMT

... I've found the paper, it's "Why Isn't Trust Transitive" by Bruce Christianson and William Harbison, proceedings of the (first) Security Protocols Workshop,

Re: trust management (was Re: problem with the death of X.509 PK

Pornthep Narula — Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:57:06 GMT

... my pleasure! ... unfortunately, we (in general) seems to have been doing much of the former and too little of the latter.... ... i agree that traditional

Re: The role of certificates in Balkanized domains

James A. Rome — Sat, 09 Jun 2001 17:16:46 GMT

I am well aware of Akenti. The main problem it solves is stakeholder's rights, but aside from allowing or disallowing access to a resource, Akenti has no

Re: The role of certificates in Balkanized domains

Ng Pheng Siong — Sat, 09 Jun 2001 16:26:48 GMT

... Hi, There is a project called Akenti, which is ... calling trusted assistant Mr Google ... ah, here it is: http://www-itg.lbl.gov/security/Akenti/

Re: faith-based security and kinds of trust

Niels M�ller — Sat, 09 Jun 2001 13:35:42 GMT

... I think the defining component of psychosis is a distorted perception of reality. If I'm psychotic, I might honestly believe that I am Elvis Presley and

Re: trust management (was Re: problem with the death of X.509 PKI)

R. A. Hettinga — Sat, 09 Jun 2001 01:51:05 GMT

... Finance, boys and girls. Finance. ... Cheers, RAH (Carl says this all the time. It's true. :-)) -- ... R. A. Hettinga The Internet

Re: trust management (was Re: problem with the death of X.509 PKI)

Tony Bartoletti — Sat, 09 Jun 2001 01:36:38 GMT

... Good point. We often toss probabilities around in formulas, and don't include at least one of "per unit time", or "per event, per transaction", or some

Re: trust management (was Re: problem with the death of X.509 PKI)

Martin Smith — Sat, 09 Jun 2001 00:56:11 GMT

Well, then this suggests a time element (as in net present value of the negative future harm.) I'm not actually going anywhere with this thought . .. but it

Re: trust management (was Re: problem with the death of X.509 PKI)

Tony Bartoletti — Fri, 08 Jun 2001 22:47:33 GMT

Pornthep, First, thanks for the dictionary link! Some comments below. ... It is always a bit of both. ... The problem with most dictionaries is that they are

Re: trust management (was Re: problem with the death of X.509 PKI)

Pornthep Narula — Fri, 08 Jun 2001 22:28:43 GMT

... Aso, Neville Holmes recently brought up terminology standards issue on his 'The Profession' column in the IEEE Computer May 2001 issue titled 'The Great

Re: trust management (was Re: problem with the death of X.509 PKI)

Pornthep Narula — Fri, 08 Jun 2001 19:15:47 GMT

... [...] ... [...] ... i guess we could choose to either 1) continue debating and try to reach a closed-group consensus on the definitions of these

Re: trust management (was Re: problem with the death of X.509 PKI)

Tony Bartoletti — Fri, 08 Jun 2001 18:08:34 GMT

... [snip] ... I do agree. The point was whether "to trust" = "to rely upon". It tends to be so in the hypothetical, but although you might not trust that

Re: The role of certificates in Balkanized domains

Carl Ellison — Fri, 08 Jun 2001 14:22:56 GMT

... Hash: SHA1 ... You're right, it's possible to put great enforcement into the programming language, if you have an interpreted language and it's designed

Re: The role of certificates in Balkanized domains

James A. Rome — Fri, 08 Jun 2001 13:24:23 GMT

Since I am in a non-defense lab, we do not do (much) classified work, and do not have secure computers with MAC. :-(( I have often longed for something like a

Re: The role of certificates in Balkanized domains

Carl Ellison — Fri, 08 Jun 2001 00:57:28 GMT

... Hash: SHA1 Jim, this is a great discussion. As usual, Dave is almost 100% on the money. The one place I disagree with him is at the end of his message. I