<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>staranalyser at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/</link>
    <description>staranalyser</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: New Files</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:33:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Dawes</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1180</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1180</guid>
      <description>Robin, all the images were captured from a fixed tripod, so I could only get about 5 secs exposure before trailing. Hope to extend it a bit when I put it on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Files</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:44:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>staranalyser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1179</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1179</guid>
      <description>Hi Mark, Interesting setup. That should give close to the maximum resolution possible from the Star Analyser. (A nice small star size without giving the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Files</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:16:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Dawes</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1178</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1178</guid>
      <description>Hello everyone, it&#39;s been a while since I posted any new files. I have placed a number of spectra in this folder of the Files section, /User_Folders/MarkD/. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: exposure times</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken Harrison</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1177</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1177</guid>
      <description>Robin, As you say, the Star Analyser can get down to pretty faint magnitudes. I stand corrected!! Ken</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: exposure times</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:09:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>staranalyser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1176</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1176</guid>
      <description>Hi Ken, ... The grating in the Lhires is 1200 or 2400 lpm compared with 100 in the Star ... into a ... Actually this is an underestimate as it also depends on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: exposure times</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:13:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Hopkins</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1175</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1175</guid>
      <description>A nice thing about the Lhires III is that you can easily interchange the gratings. While I believe the unit normally comes with the 2,400 l/mm grating, 1,200,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: exposure times</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:48:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken Harrison</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1174</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1174</guid>
      <description>Dominique, A couple of reasons: The grating in the Lhires is 1200 or 2400 lpm compared with 100 in the Star analyser, this means simplistically that the star</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>exposure times</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dominique hoste</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1173</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1173</guid>
      <description>hello, i follow the discussion ... i was suprised about the exposure times of objects with the Lhires III: 15 minutes to 1 hour ..? with the Star Analyser i</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New file uploaded to staranalyser </title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:50:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1172</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1172</guid>
      <description>Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the staranalyser group. File        :</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New file uploaded to staranalyser </title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:40:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1171</guid>
      <description>Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the staranalyser group. File        :</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2 new spectrum</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:05:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>staranalyser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1170</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1170</guid>
      <description>Hello Marcelo, Thank you. It is interesting for to see some southern stars.  There is a nice strong emission line in the blue in your WR78 spectrum. Is it He</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 new spectrum</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marcelo Rios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1169</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1169</guid>
      <description>Hello The night of the 23/06/2008 I could take new phantoms, WR78 and HD 6271 WR78 http://www.espacioprofundo.com.ar/foros/about5134.html HD 6271 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DSI Cameras and Lhires III</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:49:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Olivier Thizy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1168</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1168</guid>
      <description>Jeff, Thanks for the report. An very nice alternative to neon line, for use with DSI Pro I, would be to use telluric (atmospheric) lines. There are at least 5</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DSI Cameras and Lhires III</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:33:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Hopkins</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1167</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1167</guid>
      <description>For those who wish to venture into spectroscopy with a Lhires III spectrograph and use DSI cameras, here are some tips. A DSI Pro (I) has a field of view too</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: calculation FWMH with Vspec</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:35:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dominique hoste</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1166</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/staranalyser/message/1166</guid>
      <description>hello Robin, thanks. Your answer was the answer on my question. i was confused between the radial velocity of the star and &quot;the rotationel + doppler velocity</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr4.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Jul  8 22:23:39 PDT 2008 -->
