<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>stellaris_lm at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/</link>
    <description>Stellaris</description>

    <item>
      <title>A Tools for Cortex M3</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:54:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ifindapig</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/156</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/156</guid>
      <description>Hi All Recommend a new platform for Cortex m3 : Coocox It contains IDE: Cobuilder DEBUGGER: CoDebugger LINK: Colink RTOS: Coos You can directly debug your</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CMSIS version 1.30 available</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pawel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/153</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/153</guid>
      <description>Hi, The latest CMSIS version 1.30 is available. This release includes support for CM0 and CM3 cores and these TI series: LM3S Download link: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: You&#39;ve received a private message from a friend!</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:45:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Donald H</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/152</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/152</guid>
      <description>... Will someone ban this jerk !! don</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [stm32] Codesourcery GCC - (s)printf issues</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Aaron Greer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/148</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/148</guid>
      <description>Sorry, I had a typo.  I am actually using sprintf.  I just got it to work (marginally) by increasing the stack size to 2KB, which seems huge. It seems</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Codesourcery GCC - (s)printf issues</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:12:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Aaron Greer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/147</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/147</guid>
      <description>I know that 99% of embedded systems are really better off not using any printf type functions for size and time constraint reasons, but I&#39;m doing something</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: &quot;TI is scrambling in MCUs&quot; -</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>elektrknight</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/137</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/137</guid>
      <description>- ... little about the ARM Cortex line that gives it a significant edge over any other MCU architecture.  The Cortex parts are a big improvement over the old</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: &quot;TI is scrambling in MCUs&quot; -</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:58:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rick Collins</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/136</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/136</guid>
      <description>... I don&#39;t follow this reasoning.  Anything Energy Micro can do with a 32 bit CPU can be done with an 8 bit MCU and done better.  There is little about the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: &quot;TI is scrambling in MCUs&quot; -</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:28:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>elektrknight</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/135</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/135</guid>
      <description>... I have to disagree the low power Cortex-M0 and even Cortex-M3 based chips from the likes of Energy Micro shape up to be a very tough competitors even for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: &quot;TI is scrambling in MCUs&quot; -</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 05:37:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William &quot;Chops&quot; Westfield</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/134</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/134</guid>
      <description>... I thought the article lost a lot of credibility when they implied that they expected ARM devices to replace MSP430.  The MSP40 has a nice little niche</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: &quot;TI is scrambling in MCUs&quot; -</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rick Collins</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/133</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/133</guid>
      <description>... That reads like &quot;newspeak&quot;!  It actually implies that TI was not &quot;serious&quot; about the embedded market before (whatever that means).  I had the impression</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&quot;TI is scrambling in MCUs&quot; -</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:19:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>elektrknight</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/132</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/132</guid>
      <description>Hi, EETimes has an article discussing TI strategy in MCU market. These two quotes say quite a bit about it: &quot;The TI ARM MCU roadmap has appeared stagnant for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TI buys Luminary Micros</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:59:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>elektrknight</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/131</guid>
      <description>... As far as I know TI had licensed Cortex-M3 a while ago. They even had some press releases about using it in TMS470M series but I do not think any Cortex-M3</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TI buys Luminary Micros</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:28:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William &quot;Chops&quot; Westfield</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/130</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/130</guid>
      <description>... Do they?  They have the Cortex A8 OMAP processors (as used on Beagleboard), and they have some older ARM9 OMAP and ARM7 (?) based TMS470 series, but I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TI buys Luminary Micros</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:20:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rick Collins</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/129</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/129</guid>
      <description>... I got an email from Luminary announcing this.  I am a bit surprised as TI already has a line of M3 Cortex processors.  But I believe Luminary is targeted</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TI buys Luminary Micros</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:32:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William &quot;Chops&quot; Westfield</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/128</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/stellaris_lm/message/128</guid>
      <description>Woah! Texas Instruments (TI) Incorporated (NYSE: TXN) announced today that it will expand its microcontroller (MCU) portfolio with the acquisition of Luminary</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Feb 13 02:06:11 PST 2010 -->
