<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>stoics at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/</link>
    <description>International Stoic Forum</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: &quot;The universe is change, life is judgment&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:44:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jan Garrett</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27595</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27595</guid>
      <description>The Greek is: ho kosmos--alloio*sis, ho bios--hupole*psis, with the asterisked letters being omega and eta respectively.  The word being translated by Hammond</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Conditional statements and the Stoics</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:54:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27594</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27594</guid>
      <description>Thanks for the references Paul; the similarities of the logical systems (Pierce&#39;s and Chrysippus&#39;) is indeed interesting. I  think the &quot;contextual value&quot; of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The universe is change; life is judgment</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:00:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Kelly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27593</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27593</guid>
      <description>I own Martin Hammond&#39;s translation of the Meditations (Penguin Classics) (Paperback) http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0140449337/ref=ox_ya_oh_product Hammond&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Post-neo-Stoicism</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:56:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Kelly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27592</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27592</guid>
      <description>Hi Jules, ... But as I understand Nussbaum, that is the only feature of Stoicism which she incorporates into her own philosophy; and she doesn&#39;t accept the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Post-neo-Stoicism</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:33:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>iamalemur</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27591</guid>
      <description>... Perhaps not... This is something I&#39;ve been thinking about a lot. Would they still have attempted to maintain their position on the separation of the mind</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Conditional statements and the Stoics</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mreeyore1968</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27590</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27590</guid>
      <description>Dear Kevin yes it&#39;s a good (handy) trick. I remember writing about these issues, some years ago on this forum, and there was some concern that I was reducing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Post-neo-Stoicism</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:22:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stoic Stoic</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27589</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27589</guid>
      <description>It&#39;s difficult to define what New Stoicism is. At its broadest, its the modern (ie post-1950) revival of interest in Stoicism, and its practical relevance to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Post-neo-Stoicism</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27588</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27588</guid>
      <description> I think the conception of energy, was something they did not have. The fundamental idea that &quot;only a body could effect a body&quot; had far reaching effects on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Post-neo-Stoicism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:52:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>brunians@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27587</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27587</guid>
      <description>I have no idea what Chrysippus argument is, but divination works well enough, as anyone who has bothered to learn one of the methods of divining can attest. .</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Conditional statements and the Stoics</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>KevinC</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27586</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27586</guid>
      <description>All, In chapter III &quot;Propositional Connectives&quot; of the book Stoic Logic by Benson Mates, Mr. Mates discusses Implication from a historical perspective. He</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Post-neo-Stoicism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:30:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Kelly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27585</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27585</guid>
      <description>Hi Michel, I&#39;ve just recently found it impossible to accept Chrysippus&#39; argument for and belief in the existence of divination. But I can&#39;t think of any of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Post-neo-Stoicism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:54:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michel Daw</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27584</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27584</guid>
      <description>Good idea. Let&#39;s open it up. What elements of ancient Stoic practice and tradition could (or should) be updated to reflect modern thought in the sciences,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The US military&#39;s new spiritual fitness programme</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:46:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Kelly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27583</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27583</guid>
      <description>Hi Michel, If there are good arguments for neo-stoic views, especially those that argue against views held by Stoics who are not neo-stoics, this is the place</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The universe is change; life is judgment</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Kelly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27582</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27582</guid>
      <description>A favorite saying from Marcus Aurelius (_Med._, IV.3): The universe is change; life is judgment. &quot;This then remains: Remember to retire into this little</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The US military&#39;s new spiritual fitness programme</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:02:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michel Daw</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stoics/message/27581</guid>
      <description>Hey Dave: I was going to post some long reply as to how little we actually have to work on. But I found that I did not want to start an argument, nor seem to </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Dec  1 08:34:48 PST 2009 -->
