tabletopbaseball at Yahoo! Groups

Re: ballpark baseball

Bill Priester — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:29:53 GMT

After many years of playing various baseball cards and dice games, I read about Ball Park in 2006 and reluctantly purchased the game. I say reluctantly

Re: throwback baseball 1.0

Paul — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:28:19 GMT

You can do whatever floats your boat. If you like any particular game over the other, that is fine. I was just responding to the following statement: if they r

Re: throwback baseball 1.0

wilfredo anderson — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:27:48 GMT

Well, this is not an easy issue-but it will depend on the age of the players,if they work, are married, have children, or are alone-singles. Because time

Re: throwback baseball 1.0

Paul — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:27:32 GMT

I guess it depends. Here is a PtP card. Is it too "involved"? I always thought they were quite simple.

Re: throwback baseball 1.0

Chris Shockey — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:27:09 GMT

I think in both strat and replay baseball you see the actual player card on the screen; Sent from my iPhone

Re: throwback baseball 1.0

wilfredo anderson — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:27:01 GMT

I have to read again when i saw a comment that in ballpark baseball you as a the manager make much decisions than , say in strato-- i have to disagree.

Re: throwback baseball 1.0

Chris Shockey — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:27:16 GMT

Again, it's not the rolling of the dice in question here; it's some of the bookeeping involved. I can play about 2 games per hour tabletop vs 3-5 on the pc. I

Re: 10 sided dice

Francisco Colmenares — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:22:49 GMT

Seriously, are 10 sided dice THAT much more expensive than 20 sided die that you need to resort to that? If cost is an issue there's always online dice

Re: throwback baseball 1.0

curt young — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:22:20 GMT

yes, n e 1 using 3d10 is getting tremendous accuracy if using 3 different colors, but the player card will have 2 b mighty "involved". i would definitely

Re: throwback baseball 1.0

Paul — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:38:36 GMT

If you are using 3 dice, you are getting a random number between 0-999. Isn't that the same accuracy as a computer program choosing a random number between

Re: A great new baseball game...

dwight braid — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:38:26 GMT

i found it at www.xtrainningsgame.com. ... From: Seth Thompson Subject: Re: A great new baseball game... To:

Re: ballpark baseball

Dennis Lord — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:38:03 GMT

I have purchased and played Ball Park baseball. IT is a very detailed simulation. Also very realistic. It is quite expensive to purchase an entire season, but

ballpark baseball

Joseph Runde — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:36:19 GMT

Hi, I've played a lot of Ball Park (>1000) and know a bit about its history. The game has been around for more than 50 years, though its earliest

Re: throwback baseball 1.0

Chris Shockey — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:36:03 GMT

Another one of the reasons I like Replay computer baseball is that it also recreates the tabletop version of the game; you see the player cards, the dice

Re: throwback baseball 1.0

curt young — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:30:07 GMT

hey u guys: i definitely prefer dice and player cards in a baseball simulation 2 my computer games, but i know that i could easily build better accuracy into a