<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>tankwreck_game at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/</link>
    <description>Tankwreck Modern Armor Wargame Rules</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: WW2</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:09:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/316</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/316</guid>
      <description>... I&#39;m very much afraid that it got pushed onto the back burner by other projects.  An initial attempt was made, but I have decided against the system I was</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WW2</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:03:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>meadow5225</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/315</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/315</guid>
      <description>Some time ago there was talk of a WW2 variant of Tankwreck (which we continue to play with great satisfaction)any news?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tankwreck at 20mm</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/314</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/314</guid>
      <description>... I would certainly hope it would be! Martin Bourne</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tankwreck at 20mm</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:45:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>saladin_27</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/313</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/313</guid>
      <description>I see Tankwreck as a very nice generic system that could easily be modified for just about any scale or purpose.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tankwreck at 20mm</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:01:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vanders9</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/312</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/312</guid>
      <description>Dear Joseph, I designed Tankwreck for 1/285 or 1/300 because that was the standard size for modern fighting when I entered the hobby.  Larger scales and lower</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tankwreck at 20mm</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>palermo_joseph2000</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/311</guid>
      <description>Dear Group, I know that Tankwreck is only for 1/285th but I need to know if Martin or any players have tried it at 20mm using 1 model = 1 tank, 1 stand of men</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New file uploaded to tankwreck_game </title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 14:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/310</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/310</guid>
      <description>Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the tankwreck_game group. File        : /South</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rules question</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>C. Andrew Walters</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/309</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/309</guid>
      <description>I like the single pass rule. It gives the player with the initiative a little control without ruining the game. So if I have the initiative and pass, you must</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rules question</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:58:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/308</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/308</guid>
      <description>Hello to everyone.  I just received my set of rules yesterday, and started going through them.  Guess what?  First question I had was about passing.  The next</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scenarios and stuff</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:53:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Colin Nash</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/307</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/307</guid>
      <description>Hi, I&#39;m finally getting my oddzial osmy 1/600th figures finished for Tankwreck and to get in the mood I have been reading General Sir John Hackett&#39;s Third</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Invasion of Cuba, 1962</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:18:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>palermo_joseph2000</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/306</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/306</guid>
      <description>Has anyone thought of doing a proposed invasion of Cuba as per 1962 Operations plan? How would Tankwreck work with such a proposed scenario on a platoon basis?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rules question</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:35:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vanders9</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/305</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/305</guid>
      <description>... Heh...I guess we need some scenarios then! The problem is that they almost have to be hypothetical.  Still, I shall see what can be done! Martin Bourne</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rules question</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Whitehouse</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/304</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/304</guid>
      <description>... Welcome. It just shows that you really do need scenario type gaming to make the rules work. Usually in modern warfare its attack/defence battles and that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rules question</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:20:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vanders9</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/303</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/303</guid>
      <description>... initiative .... ... players ... pass ... this ... have ... both ... Heh...yes this is a logical disconnect!  I would suggest not allowing someone to pass</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rules question</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:04:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chris &amp; Lisa</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/302</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/tankwreck_game/message/302</guid>
      <description>Just got my Tankwreck rules today (thanks Martin), and am having a first read through, and have the following question, re initiative .... with the whole</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Feb 10 01:22:50 PST 2010 -->
